Welcome to my Crime and Justice blog! I am a 19 year old criminal justice student at the University of Winnipeg. I advocate for prisoners' rights, human rights, equality and criminal justice/prison system reforms.
Showing posts with label Dangerous Driving Causing Death. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dangerous Driving Causing Death. Show all posts

Friday, August 20, 2010

Sentencing for woman who accidentally killed two-- gets suspended sentence

Driver who accidentally killed two, gets suspended sentence and banned from driving for 10 years

A Winnipeg woman offered a tearful apology Friday to the families of two pedestrians she killed a horrific downtown crash.
Lucy Muthoka, 52, was handed a two-year suspended sentence with probation after pleading guilty to dangerous driving causing death for the June 2008 incident near the intersection of Donald Street and St. Mary Avenue in downtown Winnipeg.
William Halcrow, 57, and James Ross, 58, were killed instantly after being hit by Muthoka’s Subaru Forester. The two friends were from the Cross Lake reserve in northern Manitoba and were in Winnipeg for medical treatment.
"God being my witness, I never intended to harm. Words fail to express how sorry I am," Muthoka told a large courtroom gathering which included family and friends of the two men. "I am more sorry than the world will understand. I will continue to pray for the healing of everyone affected by this. May God meet the needs of everyone whose lives were changed."
Crown attorney Zane Tessler said Muthoka was an inexperienced driver who had just completed five refresher courses after purchasing a new car. While exiting a downtown parkade, she somehow hit the gas pedal instead of her brake and accelerated rapidly, striking several vehicles and people at the crowded intersection during rush-hour traffic.
Muthoka also hit a fire hydrant, which caused hundreds of litres of water to quickly flood the area. That hampered the police investigation because it was difficult to re-create the scene and figure out the sequence of events.
Several bystanders who witnessed the crash - and narrowly avoided being hit - tried frantically to revive the two gravely injured men, as did firefighters and paramedics upon arrival. A third man was pinned between two cars and suffered serious injuries, as did the drivers of two other vehicles.
"The degree of resulting carnage was substantial," said Tessler. Muthoka wasn’t intoxicated or distracted by anything such as a cellular phone or texting, court was told. It was a "perfect summer day" with clear skies and dry roads.
Muthoka has no prior criminal record and is a devoutly religious single mother who has spent the past decade working for Agriculture Canada. She is originally from Kenya and serves as an elder within the local community, along with being heavily involved in her church. More than 30 people filed glowing letters of support on her behalf.
"Her sense of guilt is enormous," said defence lawyer Saul Simmonds. "This is a decent, honest, hardworking person. It’s the nightmare for everyone who gets behind the wheel."
The families of both victims made emotional impact statements in court, describing how both men were loved and respected by their community.
"The pain of loss is excruciating," said Ross’ sister, Betty. "To lose someone in such a sudden, unexpected and inhumane way."
The sentencing judge said this case was especially difficult given the tragic circumstances, Muthoka’s obvious lack of intent and her glowing background. He said no punishment can undo the damage caused or bring the victims back.
He ordered Muthoka to perform 240 hours of community service work and banned her from driving for a 10-year period. Muthoka also expressed a desire to meet with the families of the victims and make a charitable donation on their behalf, if they wished, letter of apology and mediation. 

No jail for killer Winnipeg driver 
A Winnipeg woman who killed two Manitoba men in a devastating crash more than two years ago will not go to jail for her dangerous driving.
Lucy Muthoka, 53, was handed a suspended sentence and two years of probation Friday in the deaths of William Halcrow, 57, and James Ross, 58, on the evening of June 25, 2008.
The two friends were killed after being struck by an erratically driven Subaru Forester near the corner of Donald Street and St. Mary Avenue. They were in Winnipeg from their home community of Cross Lake to attend medical appointments.
After a prolonged police investigation, Muthoka, the Subaru's driver, was arrested and charged with two counts of criminal negligence causing death on Dec. 11, 2008.
The Crown stayed the more serious charges in exchange for her guilty pleas to dangerous driving causing death.
'It's like getting kicked some more when you already suffered.'—Marlene Castel
The conditions of Muthoka's probation include performing 240 hours of community service work, writing a letter of apology to the families of the victims and the community of Cross Lake and participating in mediation with the families if they request it in the future.
She is forbidden from driving in Canada for the next 10 years.
She walked out of court at about 2:30 p.m. CT after signing her probation order.

Sudden acceleration

Muthoka was coming out of the Millennium Library's parkade when her car suddenly accelerated, according to a brief summary of the Crown's facts of the case told to provincial court Judge Brent Stewart.
She slammed into a truck, swerved across a street and struck the two men, who died at the scene despite efforts by paramedics and passersby to save their lives.
Another man, David Matsubara, was injured, but survived.
Halcrow and Ross's families travelled to Winnipeg to attend Friday's sentencing hearing. Members of each family admitted being disappointed at the sentence Muthoka was given.
'It was lenient for her but not lenient for us.'—Betty Ross
"It's like getting kicked some more when you already suffered. There's no words I could use except that I'm very disappointed," said Marlene Castel, Halcrow's sister.
Ross's sister, Betty Ross, told CBC News that it appeared all efforts were being made during the court hearing to shield Muthoka from punishment.
"It almost felt that everybody was cushioning her, and that they were lifting her up and of course, the judge took that," Ross said.
"Sure enough, it was lenient for her but not lenient for us."
At a prior hearing, court heard that Muthoka had been sent threatening notes about the deadly crash. The nature of the notes was not revealed in court.
Muthoka spoke in court and apologized for what happened, but the victims' families said they were upset she didn't look at them while saying she was sorry.


Pretty biased headline CBC. This woman did not kill anybody intentionally. It was a complete accident which could have happened to anybody. Labeling her as a "killer" is really inappropriate. Plus, saying "no jail" makes it appear as if that type of sentence was expected. This woman has to live with the details of this horrific tragedy for the rest of her life and expresses sincere remorse. I think that is enough punishment. Prison for this woman would be considered cruel and would serve no purpose.  

Her sense of guilt is enormous-- driver pleads guilty to killing two men 
An inexperienced Winnipeg driver who accidentally hit the gas pedal instead of her brake offered a tearful apology to the families of two pedestrians she killed in a chaotic downtown crash.
Lucy Muthoka, 52, was handed a two-year suspended sentence with probation Friday after pleading guilty to dangerous driving causing death for the June 2008 incident near the intersection of Donald Street and St. Mary Avenue.
William Halcrow, 57, and James Ross, 58, were killed instantly after being hit by Muthoka's Subaru Forester. The two friends were from the Cross Lake reserve in northern Manitoba and were in Winnipeg for medical treatment.
"God being my witness, I never intended to harm. Words fail to express how sorry I am," a tearful Muthoka told a large courtroom gathering, which included family and friends of the two men. "I am more sorry than the world will understand. I will continue to pray for the healing of everyone affected by this. May God meet the needs of everyone whose lives were changed."
Crown attorney Zane Tessler said Muthoka was an "infrequent" driver who had just completed five refresher courses after purchasing a new car. She had placed a "novice driver" warning sign at the back of the vehicle.
Her driving instructor later told police she wouldn't have had the skills to pass a driving test following her first lesson, but likely would have following completion of the course.
While exiting the Millennium Library parkade just after 4:30 p.m., Muthoka suddenly accelerated rapidly, striking several vehicles and people at the crowded intersection during rush-hour traffic. Muthoka also went up on the sidewalk and hit a fire hydrant, which caused hundreds of litres of water to quickly flood the area. That hampered the police investigation because it was difficult to recreate the scene and figure out the sequence of events.
Several witnesses -- who narrowly avoided being hit -- tried frantically to revive the two gravely injured men lying in the rapidly rising waters, as did firefighters and paramedics. A third man was pinned between two cars and suffered serious injuries, as did the drivers of two other vehicles.
"The degree of resulting carnage was substantial," Tessler said.
Muthoka wasn't intoxicated or distracted by anything such as a cellular phone, court was told. It was a "perfect summer day" with clear skies and dry roads.
Muthoka had no criminal record and is a religious single mother who has spent the past decade working for Agriculture Canada.
She is originally from Kenya and serves as an elder within the local community. More than 30 people filed letters of support on her behalf.
"Her sense of guilt is enormous," defence lawyer Saul Simmonds said. "She goes to sleep at night praying for Mr. Ross and Mr. Halcrow and their families. She wakes up praying for them. This is a decent, honest, hard-working person. It's the nightmare for everyone who gets behind the wheel."
The families of both victims made emotional impact statements in court, describing how both men were loved and respected by their community. They were joined by the Cross Lake chief and council members.
"The pain of loss is excruciating," said Ross' sister, Betty. "To lose someone in such a sudden, unexpected and inhumane way."
Provincial court Judge Brent Stewart said the case was especially difficult given the tragic circumstances, Muthoka's obvious lack of intent and her glowing background. He said no punishment can undo the damage caused or bring the victims back.
"This is not a court of vengeance," said Stewart. Outside court, several family members expressed anger at the suspended sentence and questioned the sincerity of Muthoka's apology.
As part of her penalty, Stewart ordered Muthoka to perform 240 hours of community service and banned her from driving for a 10-year period.
Muthoka also expressed a desire to meet with the families of the victims and make a charitable donation on their behalf, if they wished.



I completely agree with the sentence of this woman. Prison should only be implemented for the most dangerous individuals and this woman, does not appear to pose a great risk to the community. This killing was an accident, not intentional. How would prison help her? What purpose would that serve? None. It is a negative environment with pro criminal attitudes and values and the prison subculture would likely have a negative impact on this woman's life. Plus, most prisoners are released with little assistance, support, guidance, rehabilitation, no housing or employment and often resort back to crime or end up living in poverty. That is not acceptable. 

This woman offered a tearful apology which clearly shows that she feels remorse for the consequences of her actions. She clearly feels absolutely horrible for what happened, and she will have to live with the fact that she killed two people for the rest of her life. That is enough punishment. Prison is not needed and would only cause more harm to her psychological well being. Hitting the gas pedal instead of the brake, is an honest mistake which could happen to any new driver. She had no intention to harm those individuals. This woman has no prior criminal record and is a single mother. She needs to be able to provide for her children and prison would hamper that. Studies show that children without parents and living in foster care are more likely to become delinquent or antisocial as they have little attachment to their parents, especially if their mother is in prison. That would not help her family situation at all and would set her children up for failure and possibly later crime. I believe this woman is a decent and hard working individual who made an honest and horrific/tragic mistake. She even wants to meet with the families and make a donation on their behalf. That shows the compassion and kindness of this woman's heart. It was a horrible accident and she feels extreme remorse and guilt for what happened. Punishment would be unnecessary and harsh. This woman's needs the public's sympathy. She had no intent whatsoever. It was an accident and she is paying for it in her soul. She stepped on the wrong pedal by mistake. There is no way you could send this woman to jail as there was no intent on doing anything incriminating with her vehicle. She was not driving recklessly, intentionally speeding, blowing through stop signs, etc. 

She was following the rules of the road and put her foot on the wrong pedal by mistake. Anyone who advocates for prison time is unreasonably harsh, vengeful and unsympathetic. This woman is devoutly religious, a church leader, with n prior criminal record who accidentally hit the gas pedal instead of the brake. She just came out of a parking garage, accelerated by accident and smashed into cars and people. Horrible accident. 2 pedestrians were killed instantly, and another man pinned between two cars. 

I think we all need to step back and try to understand this was an accident. This could happen to ANYONE! I for one would be horrified if I ever caused something like this and I think we need to remember "there but for the grace of god go I" I feel terrible for everyone involved. So sad.

I am seriously saddened to see some of these remarks. The article clearly stated she was an unexperienced driver that had recently taken a refresher course. She may have gotten her licence 15 years ago and hasn't really driven since.
She is obviously distraught and appears to be a hardworking, charitable woman.
I'd hate to see my fellow winnipegers stand in judgement of me if I were to make a mistake. It appears that everyone should go to jail for everything when you read these boards.

Wow you people are so unsympathetic. There was no intent by this woman whatsoever. It was a frak accident. She is paying for it inside her soul. I can't imagine the guilt of killing two people when all you were trying to do was exit a parkade. she stepped on the wrong pedal by mistake.

My question is if she was such a bad or inexperienced driver, how did she pass her road test? There lies the problem in this case. It's the womans fault but indirectly only. There is no way you can send this person to jail for vechiular manslaughter as there was no intent on doing anything incriminating with her vechicle. She was not driving recklessly-and by that I mean intentionally speeding, blowing stop signs etc. she was following the rules of the road and put her foot on the wrong pedal by mistake. Enough said. Jail time, give me a break      


There are two reasons to put people in jail:

#1 - to keep dangerous criminals from harming society. This was an accident, regardless of whether the woman was a poor driver or whether it was a genuine accident. Taking her license away for ten years (and the obvious emotional guilt she has) is enough to keep her from harming others; and

#2 - to serve as a warning to others that this kind of action isn't acceptable. I don't know about the rest of you, but whether this woman is put behind bars for 25 years, or whether she walks free, it doesn't stop me from either having an automobile accident, nor does it stop inexperienced drivers.

Our justice system is flooded with criminals, so putting her in jail takes a bed away from real repeat offenders that continually disobey our laws. This woman did something awful, and she has to live with that for the rest of her life. I don't even agree with jail time when it's drinking and driving from a remorseful person, let alone just an inexperienced driver.

Keep this woman off the road, let her do the community service, that in itself is enough punishment and will do the best for society. Putting her in jail will not bring the dead back, nor will teach her or anyone else a lesson not to have an auto accident.

It's very unfortunate, but accidents happen.

in this case, people shouldn't judge her. It could happen to ANY ONE OF US.


This was an accident which could have happened to anybody. Anyone can make the mistake of hitting the gas pedal instead of the brake. It's tragic that two individuals were killed, but we have to understand that this killing was completely unintentional. This woman had no intention to harm or kill anybody and therefore, should not be punished. I am saddened and shocked to read the many vengeful, and unsympathetic comments towards this woman. She is obviously distraught, expressed genuine remorse, has no prior criminal record, is a single mother, religious, charitable and hardworking woman. It appears that everyone should go to jail for everything when you read these comments. How can we be so unsympathetic? 

This tragic killing of two individuals, was a complete accident which could have happened to anybody. This woman hit the gas pedal instead of the brake. She had no intention to harm or kill anyone. This was an unintentional killing. I am saddened to read the many vengeful and unsympathetic comments towards this woman by the public. She is obviously distraught, expressed genuine remorse, has no prior criminal record, is a single mother and a religious, hard working and charitable woman who now has to live with extreme guilt over what happened for the rest of her life. That is enough punishment.

 

Thursday, June 10, 2010

Driver should lecture on the dangers of speeding as opposed to jail time


A 22-year-old man may not go jail for driving a speeding Chevy Cobalt that crashed and killed his friend.
If the victim's mother gets her way, Ashten Milne will end up lecturing high school students on the dangers of speeding.

Milne was in court Wednesday. A car he was driving flipped on PR 227 in the RM of Woodlands and killed his friend Nolan Kunz, 21, in June 2008.
Milne and another friend initially told police Kunz was the driver, but police investigated and Milne was charged with dangerous driving causing death.
He pleaded guilty last November to the charge. Police determined the car was going over 160 km/h when it crashed.
"It was beyond stupid, it was criminal," Crown attorney Joyce Dalmyn told the court.
Kunz's widowed mother wasn't in court, but Dalmyn said the woman "felt sorry" for Milne.
Dalmyn and defence lawyer Sarah Inness submitted a joint recommendation to Judge Robin Finlayson for no jail time for Milne. If accepted, Milne would receive three years' supervised probation, a nightly curfew, a drug and alcohol ban and a driving prohibition.
Finlayson reserved the sentencing decision.

Judge balks at sentence for killer driver
A Manitoba judge has refused to endorse a recommendation that a 22-year-old man be given a suspended sentence and probation for killing his best friend in a high-speed vehicle rollover.
Ashten Milne appeared in a Winnipeg courtroom on Wednesday expecting Judge Rob Finlayson to approve a joint recommendation between his lawyer and the Crown that he serve three years of supervised probation after pleading guilty to dangerous driving causing the death of a young Pine Falls man.
Nolan Kunz, 21, was killed on the morning of June 15, 2008 after being thrown out of a speeding Chevy Colbalt that careened out of control and rolled into the ditch along Provincial Road 227 not far from Pine Falls.
Just minutes before the incident, Kunz, Milne and another man were at a social at a nearby town, court heard.
However, police found that alcohol was not a major contributing factor in the fatal rollover.
RCMP investigating the incident determined that at the time the car left the road it was travelling between 161-173 km/h.
Milne wasn't charged until nearly a year after the rollover, when police obtained enough evidence to support charges against him.
Police initially were told that Kunz was driving, but in the months after the crash, it became apparent through interviewing witnesses and Milne's friends that he was behind the wheel.

'Frequent liar'

"He lied to get himself off the hook," Crown attorney Joyce Dalman told court Wednesday.
She also described Milne as "a frequent liar."
However, problems with the case prompted Dalman and lawyer Sarah Innes to reach a deal where Milne would plead guilty in exchange for a suspended sentence.
Finlayson balked at the deal, saying he was troubled by a pre-sentencing report showing that Milne poses a risk to become reinvolved with the criminal justice system.

Finlayson withheld his verdict for three months so another report can be done into Milne's efforts to get a job, obtain counselling and seek other help for addictions issues.
"Mr. Milne, it's on your shoulders now," he said.
Under the terms of the proposed probationary sentence, Milne would be bound by a nightly curfew, have to perform hours of community service and abstain from drugs and alcohol completely for three years.
He would also have to complete any counselling that his probation officer orders him to take.
A two-year driving prohibition is also being sought.

Victim's mom doesn't want jail time

Kunz's mother did not appear in court for the hearing because "she can't bear to be here," Dalman said.
Despite her anguish at losing her son, she doesn't want Milne to go to jail, Dalman added.
"He has to pay for what he did, but jail doesn't do any good," Dalman said the mother told her.
She told the prosecutor that she'd be happy to see Milne be forced to go and speak to high school students about what he did.
Kunz was described in court as a winter sports fanatic who made efforts to rally the interests of youth in the community toward snowboarding.
Milne declined to comment when asked by Finlayson if he had anything to say.

Victim's mom intercedes
A Winnipeg man responsible for killing his friend in a high-speed car crash should not go to jail, says the dead man’s mother.
Ashten Milne was in court Wednesday to be sentenced for a June 15, 2008 crash that killed 21-year-old Nolan Ryan Kunz.
“He has to pay for what he did, but jail doesn’t do any good,” Crown attorney Joyce Dalmyn quoted Tamy Kunz as saying. “What happened wasn’t intentional. It wasn’t what Ashten wanted to happen. It was stupid.”
Milne, 22, pleaded guilty to dangerous driving causing death in exchange for a joint Crown and defence recommendation he be sentenced to three years supervised probation.
Dalmyn said inconsistent statements by a second passenger in the vehicle who claimed at one time Kunz was behind the wheel weakened the Crown’s case against Milne.
Dalmyn said Tammy Kunz believes her son’s killer should remain free in the community where he can speak to students about the dangers of reckless driving.
Judge Rob Finlayson adjourned sentencing for at least three months, saying he needed more evidence to show Milne won’t be a danger to the community.
According to a pre-sentence report, Milne has been assessed as a medium risk to re-offend due to alcohol abuse, a history of anti-social behaviour and other factors. He has refused all offers of counselling and continues to drive even though he doesn’t have a licence.
“Normally, people like you with no record are assessed as a low risk,” Finlayson said. “It’s on your shoulders now. You may be hesitant to reach out for help, but now is the time to do it.”
Court heard Milne, Kunz and a third man had been at a wedding social in Warren and left in Milne’s 2005 Chevy Cobalt sometime before 2 a.m.
Police estimate Milne was driving at least 160 km/h when he lost control of the vehicle and crashed on PTH 227. A picture taken on Kunz’ cellphone showed an odometer reading of 220 km/h.
Paramedics found Kunz in a ditch, 30 metres from where the vehicle came to rest.
The wedding social bride-to-be, a nurse, drove by the scene before paramedics and stopped to administer CPR.
Alcohol was not a factor in the crash, Dalmyn said.
“(Milne) was driving at a ridiculous speed,” she said. “It was a young man showing off, showing how fast his car could go.”


I agree that this man should not receive jail time. I agree with the proposition of 3 years probation with a driving prohibition and lecturing on the dangers of speeding to students. He should also receive counseling and addictions treatment for substance abuse. I think this would be a much more meaningful sentence as opposed to jail, where this man would likely be negatively influenced by the environment and other inmates and receive little to no rehabilitation. 

Wednesday, May 26, 2010

Speeding driver who killed boy claims he was wrongfully convicted


A speeding motorist who had alco­hol in his body when he struck and killed a 12-year-old boy claims he has been wrongfully convicted of a crime.

Pernell Guimond appeared be­fore the Manitoba Court of Appeal Tuesday, arguing he shouldn't be held liable because he had no way of knowing about the pedestrian in his path and thought it was safe to pass a slower vehicle when he saw no oncoming traffic. He claims he should have only been found guilty of a Highway Traffic Act violation.

The high court has reserved its decision.
Guimond was convicted last year of dangerous driving caus­ing death for the August 2006 crash at Sagkeeng First Nation. He was given a two-year condi­tional sentence, which allows him to remain free in the community. The Crown had sought real cus­tody, but did not appeal the pen­alty.
Brent Guimond -- no relation -- died of massive trauma after being hit while walking along the main highway through the com­munity, 145 kilometres northeast of Winnipeg. A young female friend, who was with the boy at the time, escaped injury. They were on the poorly lit road be­cause they were afraid of bears lurking in the nearby woods, the judge was told. The girl was in the middle of the road and Guimond swerved to avoid hitting her, only to strike the boy, who was closer to the shoulder of the highway.
Guimond had been travelling west on Highway 11, stuck behind a van. He started to pull around the van -- into the oncoming lane -- when the two young pedes­trians appeared in his headlights, their backs to Guimond's car.
His case made headlines ear­lier this year after a Free Press investigation revealed he admit­ted to drinking, smelled of booze and failed two roadside screening tests following the fatal crash. By the time Guimond went to trial, all alcohol-related charges had disappeared. A provincial court judge ruled the alcohol evidence inadmissible based on problems with the way police collected it at the scene, including a lack of de­tailed notes about important con­versations.

What this man did (passing a vehicle and killing the boy) is a mistake anybody could have made and he should not be criminalized. He should be acquitted completely. It was dark and he probably didn't see the boy until the last minute, when it was too late to slam on the brakes. 

Thursday, May 13, 2010

Woman pleads guilty in fatal crash of dangerous driving causing death


A Winnipeg woman responsible for a horrifying car crash that killed two people and seriously injured a third has pleaded guilty to two counts of dangerous driving causing death.
Lucy Muthoka, 52, was originally charged with criminal negligence causing death. She entered guilty pleas to the reduced charges last March.
A sentencing date has not yet been set. Muthoka is not in custody.
Billy Halcrow, 57, and James Ross, 58, died in the collision at Donald Street and St. Mary Avenue on June 25, 2008.
Muthoka was behind the wheel of a Subaru Forester, leaving the Millennium Library parkade, when her vehicle accelerated suddenly on Donald Street, Crown attorney Zane Tessler told court last March.
The southbound vehicle swerved across the road as it approached the St. Mary Avenue intersection, where it rear-ended a truck stopped at a red light. The truck was pushed into the intersection and struck a male pedestrian, seriously injuring him. Muthoka's vehicle continued through the intersection, striking Halcrow and Ross.
Alcohol and drugs were not factors in the collision, said defence lawyer Saul Simmonds. "Lack of experience is what has her here today," Simmonds said.
Simmonds left the door open to a possible defence based on mechanical or equipment failure.
"If by some stretch of the imagination there would be some physical or mechanical reason disclosed in the future, (the Crown) will re-evaluate whether or not we should be here," he said. "My client, very clearly, is looking for some closure."

Woman pleads guilty in death of two pedestrians
WINNIPEG - A Winnipeg woman has admitted to killing two pedestrians in a horrific downtown crash.
Lucy Muthoka, 52, pleaded guilty this week to criminal negligence causing death for the June 2008 incident near the intersection of Donald Street and St. Mary Avenue in downtown Winnipeg.
William Halcrow, 57, and James Ross, 58, were killed instantly after being hit by Muthoka's Subaru Forester. The two friends were from the Cross Lake reserve in northern Manitoba and were in Winnipeg for medical treatment.
In exchange for pleading guilty, justice officials dropped more serious charges of dangerous driving causing death.
Muthoka has been free on bail since police arrested her and laid charges in December 2008. She will learn her fate later this spring once a pre-sentence report is completed.
Friends told the Free Press at the time that Muthoka is a devoutly religious single mother who was driving home from work when she was involved in the catastrophic string of events. They said the woman "was blank" about the details of the crash. She has no prior criminal record.
Police said it appeared that just prior to the crash, Muthoka had just left the underground civic parkade attached to the Millenium Library and drove up behind the stopped truck.
However instead of braking, she apparently slammed on the gas, police said, causing the truck to lurch forward into oncoming west-bound traffic and striking David Matsubara, 49, who witnesses said became pinned against another vehicle. He suffered a broken shoulder and lacerated skull.
The Subaru continued to accelerate, police said. Ross and Halcrow were hit and critically wounded. Witnesses and other passers-by scrambled to administer to the victims until emergency crews arrived.
The vehicle eventually came to a stop after slamming into a fire hydrant, causing water to rain down on the chaotic rush-hour scene. That hampered the police investigation because it was difficult to re-create the scene and figure out the sequence of events.

US expert tapped to probe fatal crash
A Winnipeg defence lawyer approached a high-profile U.S. researcher who investigated problems plaguing Toyota vehicles to see if similar problems may have been a factor in a fatal downtown crash that killed two men.
In a recent court hearing where Lucy Muthoka, 52, pleaded guilty to dangerous driving causing the deaths of William Halcrow and James Ross, lawyer Saul Simmonds told the presiding judge he was investigating whether mechanical failure may have caused her car to malfunction.
Judge Brent Stewart heard that Simmonds had been in contact with Dr. David Gilbert, an automotive technology expert who recently testified before the United States Congress that his research showed Toyota engines could rev without a driver pressing on the gas.
The Southern Illinois University-Carbondale engineering professor's claims were hotly disputed by Toyota, who blamed mechanical — not electrical — problems on an acceleration issue that prompted the recall of more than eight million cars and trucks.
Halcrow and Ross were struck and killed by Muthoka's Subaru Forester as they were crossing a downtown street during afternoon rush hour on June 25, 2008. Another man was seriously injured, but survived.
Muthoka was coming out of the Millennium Library's parkade when her car suddenly accelerated, according to a brief summary of the Crown's facts of the case told to Stewart on March 4.
She slammed into a truck, swerved across a street and struck the two Cross Lake, Man. residents, who died at the scene despite valiant efforts by paramedics and passersby to save their lives.
Simmonds suggested despite Muthoka's guilty pleas, the Crown would still be forced to reconsider its case if mechanical failure proved to be a major factor in the crash.
The police investigation took nearly six months to complete due to its complexities.
"[The Crown] recognized the fact that if by some stretch of the imagination there would be some physical or mechanical reason disclosed in the future, [the Crown] will re-evaluate whether or not we should be here," Simmonds said.
U.S. safety watchdog The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration lists a few recall notices for Subaru Foresters built between 2002 though 2008, but none relate to any issues with sudden acceleration.
Muthoka wasn't arrested until Dec. 11, nearly six months after the crash.

Inexperience to blame for crash

Simmonds told court he wanted to make it clear that the incident wasn't influenced in any way by alcohol or drugs.
"This is not one of those situations in which it is anything other than a lack of experience on the part of my client that has her here today," Simmonds said.
Under the Criminal Code, Muthoka faces a maximum 14-year prison term, however the court has ordered a pre-sentencing report be drawn up by an agency that specializes in community-based sentencing alternatives.
Neither the Crown nor Simmonds made any comment at the hearing about what sentence they are seeking in the case.
Muthoka "sought out and wanted to go through a process of expressing her apologies for whatever had taken place" since the day of the crash, Simmonds said.
He added she only stayed quiet on his advice and belief it wasn't appropriate to speak out.
At the outset of the case, Muthoka was at the receiving end of "some very threatening" notes, Simmonds said. He didn't elaborate on the nature of the notes.
But as the case wound on, the victims' families have shown they "are prepared to be involved" in some kind of restorative justice measure, Crown attorney Zane Tessler said.
Muthoka is due back in court on June 30 and remains free in the community

Driver guilty in deaths of men from Cross Lake 
A Winnipeg woman has admitted to killing two pedestrians in a horrific downtown crash.
Lucy Muthoka, 52, pleaded guilty to two counts of dangerous driving causing death for the June 25, 2008 incident at the intersection of Donald Street and St. Mary Avenue.
Muthoka has been free on bail since police arrested her and laid charges in December 2008. The matter has been adjourned to June 30 and she will learn her fate once pre-sentence reports and victim-impact statements have been completed, likely after the end of June.
William Halcrow, 57, and James Ross, 58, were killed instantly after being hit by Muthoka's Subaru Forester. The two friends were from the Cross Lake reserve in northern Manitoba and were in Winnipeg for medical treatment. Several bystanders who witnessed the crash -- and narrowly avoided being hit -- tried frantically to revive the men, as did firefighters and paramedics.
Friends told the Free Press at the time that Muthoka is a devoutly religious single mother who was driving home from work when she was involved in the catastrophic string of events. They said the Kenyan woman "was blank" about the details of the crash. She has no prior criminal record.
Just prior to the collision that killed the men, Muthoka had rear-ended a truck stopped at a light, police allege. That pushed the truck forward and injured pedestrian David Matsubara, 49, who witnesses said became pinned against another vehicle. He suffered a broken shoulder and lacerated skull.
Muthoka also hit a fire hydrant, which caused hundreds of litres of water to quickly flood the area and hampered the police investigation because it was difficult to re-create the scene and figure out the sequence of events.


I do not feel she should be sentenced to prison, as this appears to be a terrible mistake, caused by possible lack of experience or "blanking out". This woman has no prior record and is a religious person and single mother. I feel that prison would not aid this woman in becoming a better person as she would not be able to care for her child(ren). She is not dangerous to society as this is her first offence. I feel that a conditional sentence or 2-3 years probation would be appropriate along with a driving prohibition.


Sunday, March 7, 2010

Sentencing hearing for London man charged with impaired driving causing death


Andrew Kummer, 25, was released on $100,000 bail yesterday (March 19, 2009) on 15 charges, including three of impaired driving causing death
The London man accused of impaired driving causing the deaths of three people -- his best friend and two young boys -- has been freed on bail.
Andrew Kummer, 25, charged in last Friday's collision of two pickup trucks on London's outskirts, was released on $100,000 bail yesterday by justice of the peace Lorenzo Palumbo, ending an emotional, drawn-out hearing.
Still injured from the Lambeth-area crash, Kummer hobbled into the prisoner's box, hopping on his left foot and favouring his right leg.
He left the courthouse in a wheelchair, ignoring reporters' questions.
Kummer held his head in his hands for much of the proceedings, weeping at times.
His face still bore significant injuries -- large bruises were clearly visible around and below his left eye, and his forehead was severely swollen.
Police say two pickups collided at the intersection of Longwoods Road and Westdel Bourne, near Lambeth, just before 10:30 p.m. last Friday.
The crash killed best friends Mason Berube, 13, and Devon Titus, 12, both from the Chatham area. Mason's father, Jason Berube, survived but was seriously hurt.
The trio was returning home from a London Knights game, before which Mason's hockey team had played a scrimmage on the John Labatt Centre ice.
From the other pickup, Kummer and another man were hurt. A third, 26-year-old David Marshall, was killed.
Kummer is facing 15 charges including three counts of dangerous driving causing death and three of impaired driving causing death.
On his release yesterday, Kummer was told to refrain from contact with two people.
He was ordered to avoid alcohol and drugs and refrain from driving any vehicle, or even sitting in a driver's seat.
He was also told to surrender his passport to London police by this afternoon.
Kummer is to return to court April 8.

Dylan Krill could have been Andrew Kummer's fourth victim.
The 13-year-old boy from Kent Bridge, near Chatham, sat in a London court Monday, among a sad group of family and friends, to hear a driver -- who killed two of his friends and another person -- plead guilty to 10 charges in a horrific impaired driving crash.
The driver, 26-year-old Andrew Kummer, had more than twice the legal limit of alcohol in his system.
Krill could have been in the same pickup truck with Mason Berube and Devon Tinus, his two long-time Chatham pals -- both 12 -- who died in the fiery, two vehicle crash March 13, 2009 at Westdel Bourne and Longwoods Rd. on London's outskirts.
Along with others in court Monday, Krill wore a photo badge of their evening together on the first night of March break, just before the two boys died after a London Knights hockey game. "Friends Forever," the badge read.
Krill was supposed to have gone with his pals for a sleep-over at Berube's house that night, his mom said, but Berube worried that peanut butter might have been left on the kitchen counter.
He told Krill, who has a severe peanut allergy, not to come over.
"By looking out for his friends, which everybody should do, (Mason) saved his life," Beth Krill said outside the courthouse after the guilty pleas.
Earlier in the day, as Kummer's preliminary hearing was to have begun, the courtroom fell silent when Kummer stood to listen to the charges -- three of impaired driving causing death, two of impaired driving causing bodily harm, three of dangerous driving causing death and two of dangerous driving causing bodily harm.
"Guilty," he said.
Assistant Crown attorney Mark Czerkawski told Ontario Court Justice John Skowronski he would read a rendition of the facts, but promised there would be more at the next court date.
He warned the description would be disturbing.
Kummer was driving his pickup truck south on Westdel Bourne with passengers David Marshall and Randy Psaila.
Jason Berube, Mason's father, was driving his pickup along Longwoods Rd., having left the hockey game early to avoid heavy traffic.
It was about 10:15 p.m.
At the intersection, Jason Berube could see the other truck was speeding and not going to stop at the stop sign. He put on his brakes, but was struck by Kummer's truck on the passenger side.
Both trucks spun out of control into the ditch and caught fire.
Jason Berube was able to get out, despite a collapsed lung and broken femur. He tried to pull out the boys, but he was unable to save the children.
Others who came upon the crash tried to help, but the truck was engulfed in flames.
Kummer and Psaila managed to get out of Kummer's truck, but Marshall died at the scene.
A police officer noticed the smell of alcohol; Kummer said he'd had "one or two beers after work."
A blood sample test registered 210 milligrams of alcohol per 100 millilitres of Kummer's blood. Breath samples taken an hour later showed readings of 130 and 123 milligrams of alcohol per 100 millilitres of blood. An impaired driving charge can be laid for blood-alcohol levels of 80 milligrams or higher.
Czerkawski said a toxicologist from the Centre of Forensic Sciences projected the blood alcohol level at the time of the crash was between 125 and 175 milligrams. The most accurate sample, he told Czerkawski, was the blood reading.
Through data retrieved from the truck, police crash experts were able to determine Kummer's vehicle was traveling at 122 km/h in the 70-km/h zone, Czerkawski said.
A sentencing hearing will be held March 5 that will include more evidence and victim impact statements. The judge indicated he won't be sentencing Kummer on that day.
Outside court, Wendy Tinus, Devon's mother, said she was surprised at Kummer's guilty pleas. "It's still fresh in everybody's mind. It could have taken forever," she said.
She took some comfort that the case won't need to be tried. However, forgiveness is much tougher to give, she said quietly, tears in her eyes.
Jason Berube, wearing a T-shirt with the two boys' photo on it, said he wasn't sure if the guilty pleas offered any comfort. "It would be nice to see him go through the whole process and learn something," he said of Kummer. "It was a good day, put it that way."
Berube said he's been unable to return to work since the crash. The loss of the two boys, he said, "has been hell."
"Your heart is broken and you feel like you can't go on with another day," said Denielle Berube, 23, Mason's sister. "You still have to live your life but you feel, how can you possibly go on?"
Mason's aunt, Michelle Rumble of Blenheim, said she hopes for a stern sentence.
"Every time there is an accident like this, they're going to get more and more (jail time)," she said of impaired drivers. "We are going to set precedent that this is going to end some day."
Dylan said quietly he was "OK" after the hearing. His dad, Brian, who drove the boys to the game that night to meet Mason's dad, was emotional.
He said he already had a brush with an impaired driving case. One of his former teachers was one of the "Pie Ladies" -- a group of elderly women killed in a Chatham crash two years ago that sent the impaired driver to prison for four years.
"Hopefully, people will start paying attention to what is going on," he said.
"It's up to the system now to punish him for killing two boys."



Considering all the horror swirling around him, Andrew Kummer chose an odd time to become chatty.
The fires that had engulfed the two pickup trucks in the crash were out.
Three people were dead.
Kummer had plowed into Jason Berube's pickup at the T-intersection of Longwoods Rd. and Westdel Bourne on London's outskirts about 10:15 p.m. on March 13, 2009.
Two of the dead were 12-year-old buddies, Mason Berube and Devon Tinus. They'd been heading home to Chatham with Mason's dad after a night at a London Knights hockey game.
The other person killed was Kummer's good friend, David Marshall, 26, a passenger in Kummer's truck with Randy Psaila. They were heading back from the Strathroy liquor store where Marshall had left his wallet that evening.
"This kind of sucks," Kummer said to London police Const. Andrew Stanley, as he held a bandage to Kummer's injured forehead after being strapped to a backboard and loaded into an ambulance.
At Kummer's sentencing hearing Friday in London on 10 charges, including three of impaired driving causing death, Stanley recalled Kummer talking about his "bad luck."
Stanley knew what he'd seen was a nightmare.
Moments before helping Kummer, the young police officer watched helplessly as a young boy inside Berube's truck was engulfed in flames before help could get to the vehicles.
He'd spoken to Jason Berube, the badly-injured father he found lying in a field nearby.
" 'My son, my son. My kids are in that truck. You have to save my kids,' " he begged Stanley, the court heard.
It was an emotional day before Justice John Skowronski, who heard evidence of Kummer's cavalier and jovial attitude after the crash, toxicological evidence and about Kummer's three-page criminal driving record that included a bizarre crash on a runway at the London International Airport.
The judge also heard from the grieving families -- moms, dads, grandmothers, sisters, brothers and cousins - who read 20 of 27 victim impact statements filed in the case, all of them remembering loved ones taken violently and too soon.
Kummer sat silently with his defence lawyer, Brian Greenspan.
Jean-Paul Palmentier, a forensic toxicologist at the Centre for Forensic Science, estimated Kummer had consumed the equivalent of 15 to 20 bottles of beer, or 21 1/2 to 29 ounces of spirits, or a combination of both, before the crash. That was based on a blood sample taken at the hospital that put Kummer's blood-alcohol level between 175 and 191 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of blood -- more than twice the legal limit.
Assistant Crown attorney Mark Czerkawski told Skowronski that Kummer, Marshall and Psaila had been to both the Wellington Rd. beer store to buy a 12-pack and to the Strathroy liquor store that evening. After the crash, police found charred, open tall-boy Heineken cans and Red Bull cans and a 12-pack of Miller Lite bottles with the caps still on in the burnt-out wreckage.
Const. Emmett Murchland, a crash reconstructionist, reviewed grisly crime scene photos and indicated Westel Bourne had a posted 70 km/h speed limit.
Kummer's truck was travelling at 122 km/h.
Stanley spoke softly as he described the crash scene and detailed the strange conversation with Kummer.
In the ambulance, Kummer joked with the paramedics and laughed about his penis size, Stanley said, even though he knew three people were dead. He flirted with the nurses in the hospital trauma room and asked for magazines.
"At no time did he make any comments to his sorrow or remorse or how this all transpired," Stanley said.
Kummer told Stanley he had no memory of anything after he left work at 5 p.m. and admitted he'd been drinking.
Greenspan suggested Kummer had amnesia or a post-traumatic reaction.
One grieving family member in the packed courtroom stood up and muttered "come on" and "bull. . . ." before leaving.
Others noted Kummer's strange responses. Nurse Stacee Clayton testified Kummer's demeanour at the hospital was "very flat" and he had "random outbursts of laughter." She said she asked him if he wanted a family member called.
Kummer declined the offer, "because his girlfriend would be very angry at him."
Const. Joel Pavoni was asked to get breath samples and to notify Kummer that three people were dead. "He laughed and kind of stated 'Oh, that sucks,' " Pavoni said.
He told Pavoni the breath-testing machine was "neat."
Pavoni told him he was charged with impaired driving. Kummer said "that sucks."
Kummer's behaviour didn't seem to change on March 15, 2009, Marshall's best friend Matt Bartoch testified.
He was at Psaila's house and spoke on the phone with Kummer, who was still in the hospital. "He was quiet, unremorseful and not that talkative," Bartoch said, adding he couldn't make out a lot. "He never apologized once."
Kummer told him he couldn't speak loudly because a police officer was guarding his room. He said his leg was "messed up."
He told Bartoch he was "going to get out of it and that it is going to be over soon and he wants to move on."
Skowronski also learned Kummer had been involved in a previous bizarre crash in October 2007.
Czerkawski said Kummer was convicted of careless driving and failing to report an accident for driving on a London International Airport runway. He'd been at a wedding at Forest City National golf course and told police later he had only drank two beers and one vodka. He had also been taking allergy medication.
The SUV had been driven at about 100 km/h down the runway and rolled into the grass, but not before it launched into the air and sheared off an antennae and runway lights. Total damage was $127,000. Kummer left the SUV there and walked through the terminal. An Air Canada employee said he looked dishevelled and intoxicated and his suit was "messed up." He was slurring and staggering and "he didn't know where he was."
He got in a cab and left. The next morning, he told police he was tired at the wedding and when he left, he fell asleep.
He woke up after the crash and didn't know where he was.
He was fined and his parents spoke to him about the dangers of drinking and driving.
The sentencing continues March 26.

I think that this man committed a horrible act and 3 people lost their lives, but I feel that he should be sentenced to 12 years in prison and should have to attend alcohol counseling and include a lifetime driving prohibition. 

Wednesday, March 3, 2010

Escalating tension between prosecutor and ex-cop lovers, in criminal harassment trial



- A Manitoba Crown attorney says claims by her former RCMP officer boyfriend she mishandled a deadly driving case is the latest example of his attempts to intimidate her.
- Debbie Buors told court this week she did nothing wrong in the prosecution of Pernell Guimond, which is now the subject of an out-of-province judicial review. She questioned the motives of RCMP Cpl. Jeff Moyse, who recently spoke out about Buors not calling him as a witness in the high-profile case. Moyse is now on trial for criminal harassment of Buors.
- Guimond admitted to drinking, smelled of booze, failed two roadside screening tests and then refused a breathalyzer after his speeding car mowed down a 12-year-old boy, Brent Guimond, on the side of a darkened highway near Sagkeeng First Nation in August 2006.
- Yet by the time Guimond, who was no relation to the victim, went to trial last year in Winnipeg, all alcohol-related charges had disappeared. Guimond was given a conditional sentence in January after being found guilty of dangerous driving causing death.
- Alberta Justice officials will review every facet of the Guimond case to see if there was any wrongdoing by his office.
- RCMP have launched a similar probe of their own conduct.
- Moyse was the senior officer who signed off on criminal charges, including impaired driving causing death and refusing a breathalyzer. Moyse began dating Buors in April 2008, several weeks before Guimond's preliminary hearing began.
- Moyse wasn't at the scene of the crash, but said he had detailed notes about his dealings with Guimond back in the RCMP station and how the accused refused to submit to a breathalyzer test. Yet Moyse says he was surprised when his girlfriend never called him to the witness stand, believing he had important evidence to offer.
- The rocky romance between a Manitoba Crown attorney and an RCMP officer culminated in two ugly confrontations -- one inside a courtroom, the other inside a police station -- that left several victims of crime unwittingly caught in the crossfire.
- Relationship between Cpl. Jeff Moyse and prosecutor Debbie Buors, specifically its impact on the administration of justice. Moyse is on trial this week for criminal harassment of Buors but has denied wrongdoing.
- Buors is claiming a continued pattern of threatening, intimidating behaviour following their break-up in December 2008. The pair had started dating in April of the same year.
- Sue Stirling, a victim services worker with the provincial Justice Department, told court how a "serious escalation" of their issues triggered a tense scene inside the Powerview RCMP detachment on March 12, 2009.
- Buors, who handled the court circuit for the area, went to the station to interview two crime victims for upcoming trials as part of a pre-arranged meeting. But Moyse refused to let her go inside the building, telling a junior officer she was barred from the premises.
- "He was very forceful. His eyes were bulging, forehead sweating, fists clenched," Stirling said of Moyse. Buors was equally defiant about her position, telling Stirling "He can't stop me; I've got work to do, there are clients waiting."
- Both sides made threats to call their superiors, but cooler heads eventually prevailed and Buors was allowed access to one interview room. Stirling told court Tuesday the embarrassing incident was unacceptable.
- Stirling described another disturbing confrontation that occurred inside a Powerview courtroom in January 2009. Buors was preparing for a trial that day when Moyse appeared, asking her "Why are you angry with me?" Buors told him "I can't deal with this right now," but then went to another room with him. She returned a short time later, clearly upset, telling Stirling she needed to adjourn the scheduled hearing.
- "At court that day, it seemed there was a major shift in how they interacted with each other. The professionalism seemed to be missing."
- Buors was on the witness stand Tuesday morning, saying she reached her "breaking point" when she sent a sharply worded email to Moyse on March 11 -- the day before the police station incident. In it, Buors wrote she was putting Moyse "on notice" she would seek a restraining order and/or criminal charges if he had any further contact with her.
- "I will not tolerate your abuse any further," she wrote in her final sentence.
- Moyse's lawyer accused Buors of trying to cause trouble by going to his client's workplace the very next day, knowing he was on duty.
- "The only thing you were doing was baiting the bear," questioning why Moyse would allow Buors to get anywhere near him based on the threatening email.
- "That's not true. We were two professionals. We should have been able to act like ones," said Buors. She went to police with the harassment complaint days later.
- Defence drilled Buors on her role in the relationship, including the fact she still owes Moyse more than $4,000 worth of cash and property for which the officer is now suing her in civil court. Buors also admitted she has recently been the subject of two provincial wage garnishment notices after failing to pay numerous speeding tickets in her name.
- Buors blamed her troubles on the sudden deaths of her parents and troubles at home with her teenaged son.
- Buors insisted she did nothing wrong, saying Moyse was the instigator and frequently blamed her friends and co-workers for their relationship going south. Her sister, Catherine, testified Tuesday how Moyse called her in late December 2008, claiming Buors was a "crazy lady" who might harm herself. Buors then phoned an hour later, screaming Moyse had broken into her house and was holding her arms behind her back.
- "She was screaming to 'get this psycho out of my house,' " she said. Police were never called and no charges filed for that incident.
- Special prosecutor Ryan Rolston is expected to conclude the case against Moyse today by calling several of Buors' colleagues in the Crown's office to testify.