Welcome to my Crime and Justice blog! I am a 19 year old criminal justice student at the University of Winnipeg. I advocate for prisoners' rights, human rights, equality and criminal justice/prison system reforms.
Showing posts with label Conspiracy to Commit Murder. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Conspiracy to Commit Murder. Show all posts

Friday, March 26, 2010

Labrosierre, accused of first degree murder, headed directly to trial


A Manitoba man accused of first-degree murder in the slayings of his parents and brother nearly 4.5 years ago will go straight to trial without the benefit of a preliminary hearing.
Justice officials authorized a direct indictment earlier this month for 39-year-old Denis Jerome Labossiere.
Direct indictments have also been authorized for two co-accused, Michael Hince, 22, and Jeremie Toupin, 23.
Labossiere, a Hells Angels associate, and Hince have been charged on the same indictment and will be tried together. Trial dates for all three accused have not been set.
Police allege Labossiere's father Fernand, mother Rita and brother Remi were shot execution-style in their St. Leon area farmhouse before the building was burned to the ground, Nov. 26, 2005.
Preliminary hearings are held to determine if there is enough evidence to proceed to trial. Defence lawyers are often critical of direct indictments as they don't allow an accused the opportunity to test the evidence against him prior to trial.
Labossiere is also charged with three counts of conspiracy to commit murder in an alleged plot to kill two other family members and an acquaintance. The alleged targets, all Winnipeg residents, were not harmed.
In April 2008, Labossiere's nephew Joel Labossiere and his pregnant wife Magdalena were shot to death in their St. Vital home. Police charged 40-year-old Kelly John Clarke with two counts of first-degree murder.

Manitoba Justice has authorized a direct criminal indictment against a man accused of killing his elderly parents and brother in 2005.
The controversial move — one used sparingly by provincial prosecutors — means the high-profile case against Denis Jerome Labossiere, 39, will proceed directly to trial without a preliminary inquiry.
The purpose of the preliminary hearing is to determine if the Crown's case is strong enough to take to trial.
Labossiere and two other men are accused of three counts of first-degree murder in connection to the shooting deaths of Labossiere's parents and brother in 2005.
Fernand Labossiere, 78, his wife, Rita, 74, and their son Remi, 44, were found dead in their home in St. Leon, Man., after a fire in 2005. It was later determined they had been shot.
The Crown has also obtained a direct indictment against Michel Hince a 22-year-old co-accused in the case facing the same charges, but no such order yet exists for Jeremie Toupin, another man accused in the killings.
However, provincial court records indicate Toupin's charges remain active and he is due back in court on Friday.
Don Slough, Manitoba's director of prosecutions, signed the direct indictments against Labossiere and Hince on Mar. 9, according to court records.
The decision to bring the men straight to trial means the Crown does not have to show its evidence against Labossiere or Hince prior to trial. Any witnesses will only have to be called once to testify.
The two men were re-arrested at Stony Mountain Institution and formally informed of the Crown's order last Thursday. They are due back in court on Apr. 14.
The decision, however, is not without controversy in Manitoba.
In his report on the inquiry into the wrongful conviction of James Driskell, whose murder conviction was quashed after he spent more than 12 years in prison, inquiry commissioner Patrick LeSage recommended policy be revised to ensure direct indictment is only used in the most exceptional circumstances.

I don't support direct indictments as I believe that preliminary hearings are essential and very important. I see problems with the Crown having to prove that they have enough evidence, to the court. Preliminary hearing should happen in all cases of murder, in my opinion, otherwise I see it as an unfair trial. 

Thursday, March 25, 2010

Teens who plotted shooting rampage to remain in youth facility


Two teens who plotted a shooting rampage at Fort Richmond Collegiate and other schools will be allowed to serve their two year jail sentences in a youth facility, a judge ruled Wednesday.
The now 18-year-old man and 18-year-old woman were still youths at the time of their arrests in January 2009 but were sentenced as adults, meaning they could have been ordered to serve out their time in an adult jail.
Judge Brian Corrin said he saw no reason to depart from a joint Crown and defence recommendation that the teens be allowed to continue serving their sentences in a youth facility, where they have showed signs of progress.
While the teens agreed to be sentenced as adults, a defence requested publication ban remains in effect prohibiting the printing of their names.
The teens were arrested after police received a tip the boy accused had a cache of firearms and was "mentally unstable." They pleaded guilty last year to conspiracy to commit murder.
According to an agreed statement of facts, the teens planned the mass killing of students and staff at Fort Richmond Collegiate, Lorette Collegiate (where the female accused had previously been enrolled), and the University of Manitoba, as well as parishioners at the Church of the Rock in Fort Garry.

Teens to remain in jails for youth
TWO Winnipeg teens who planned to go on a deadly killing spree inside several local schools will remain in youth jails despite being raised to adult court.
The pair, now both 18, pleaded guilty last September to conspiracy to commit murder. They were sentenced to two years behind bars.
Crown and defence lawyers appeared in court Wednesday for a placement hearing, which is mandated by the Criminal Code. They all agreed the accused are making steady progress at their current youth facilities and should not be moved to an adult institution.
"From the Crown's perspective, why muck with success?" said prosecutor Susan Baragar.
Defence lawyer Greg Brodsky said his client is a "salvageable young man" provided he remains in his current environment. Youth justice officials agreed, saying his safety would be in danger if moved. His female co-accused was also reported to have made significant improvement.
The teens had stockpiled four rifles and shotguns in late 2008 in preparation for a mass killing at Fort Richmond Collegiate.
They also discussed driving the boy's father's Hummer H3 to the University of Manitoba Fort Garry campus to shoot more people. College Lorette Collegiate and Church of the Rock parishioners were among their other intended targets.

As you may know, I am opposed to young offenders being sentenced to adult prison, so I think that this is execellent decision on the Judge's part!