Welcome to my Crime and Justice blog! I am a 19 year old criminal justice student at the University of Winnipeg. I advocate for prisoners' rights, human rights, equality and criminal justice/prison system reforms.
Showing posts with label Forcible Confinement. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Forcible Confinement. Show all posts

Thursday, September 9, 2010

Gang members plead guilty to kidnapping


Two members of Winnipeg street gang have admitted to a gunpoint attack against the mother of one of their criminal colleagues.
Jammal Dillinger Jacob and Michael Brandon Williams pleaded guilty Wednesday to charges including kidnapping, forcible confinement and aggravated assault. The pair, who have ties to the Mad Cowz, will be sentenced later this year.
The 40-year-old victim immigrated from South Africa and has described her ordeal as comparable to the violence she witnessed in refugee camps prior to coming to Canada. The single mother of four suffered extensive physical and emotional injuries and was placed in the federal witness-protection program. She moved out of the province, court was told.
Jacob, Williams and another gang member had known the victim for years because of their affiliation with her son. The trio decided to try to get some money out of the woman after they crossed paths with her on the street while she was looking for her son in 2007.
They took the woman to a home on the belief her son would be there. Then, they pulled out guns and held them to her head. The gang members told the woman she hadn't "thanked them" for looking after her boy when he was in prison by ensuring he wouldn't be attacked by other inmates.
They initially demanded $10,000, then changed it to $40,000 when she said she could only offer a few hundred dollars. The men beat her with the butt ends of their guns, fracturing her left sinus cavity. They also hit her with a set of weights and a pipe, poked her in the eye socket and said she and her family would be killed.
The woman convinced the men to drive her to the restaurant where she worked so she could get some cash. She ran for help as soon as she was let out of the car.
Cory Amyotte, 23, pleaded guilty earlier this summer to aggravated assault and extortion and was sentenced to four years in prison. Amyotte and Jacob have previously made headlines for refusing to testify in a high-profile murder trial.
Phil Haiart died in October 2005 after getting caught in the crossfire of a gang shootout in the West End. Jeffrey Cansanay was convicted earlier this year of second-degree murder and sentenced to life in prison.
Cory Spence was convicted of the same charge as a youth, but raised to adult court and given life in prison.
Amyotte and another gang member, Gharib Abdullah, were the targets of the bullets that hit Haiart. Cansanay previously went on trial in 2007 but was cleared by a judge who refused to allow videotaped police statements from Amyotte and Abdullah to be played in court when they both remained silent in the witness box. The Manitoba Court of Appeal later overturned the decision and ordered a new trial, saying the judge had erred.
Abdullah and Amyotte were cited for contempt of court and received precedent-setting prison terms -- four years for Amyotte, three-and-a-half for Abdullah. Both men testified when Cansanay's second trial began this spring. Abdullah told jurors he saw Cansanay open fire on him and Amyotte. Amyotte said he was in hiding at the time and didn't see anything.
Jacob was sentenced in 2008 to two years in prison for refusing to testify at Spence's trial. He was originally given three years behind bars for contempt of court but had it reduced on appeal to two years.

These gang members should not be given overly harsh sentences. Gangs often flourish in prisons and ties are often strengthened with antisocial criminal peers. Gang members readily subscribe to the prison subculture consisting of pro criminal attitudes, values and behaviours. They are often released with little to no rehabilitation, no skills, education, or assistance/support in the community and are therefore, much more likely to resort back to crime. I feel sorry for gang members because they often join due to a lack of belonging and sense of affection, respect and identity within their biological families and therefore, they fulfill these needs in other ways, for example, by joining gangs. Family conflict, neglect, abuse, dysfunction, etc. often underlies the reasons why individuals join gangs. Those issues need to be addressed effectively. I would sentence these gang members to 2 years in prison followed by community support, intensive supervision, family counseling, and community programming aimed at gang desistance. 

Tuesday, July 20, 2010

Two more years for ex-colony member's sex crimes

A former member of a Manitoba Hutterite colony must spend another two years in prison for sex-related crimes a judge has called "humiliating and degrading."
The 20-year-old man -- who can't be named because some of his offences happened when he was a youth -- pleaded guilty earlier this spring to years of abuse against several younger boys living on the same colony.
He was seeking to be released from custody immediately with a sentence of nearly 12 months of time already served in custody. But provincial court Judge Robert Heinrichs said Monday more punishment is needed.
"This is the kind of serious and disturbing behaviour that calls out for denunciation and deterrence," he said.
Heinrichs also placed the man on three years of supervised probation with strict conditions, including having no contact with children under the age of 16. His name will also be placed on the national sex-offender registry for a 20-year period.
The man admitted to three counts of sexual interference and one count of forcible confinement. He was arrested last summer following a lengthy police investigation. Court documents alleged he abused 11 boys under the age of 14 during a seven-year span. Ultimately, he pleaded guilty to charges of abusing three boys between December 2006 and August 2009. They involve more than 50 separate incidents.
Court heard the Hutterite colony has told the man he's not welcome to return. Since the abuse came to light, his two brothers won't have anything to do with him.
"I've been kicked out of the colony," he said during sentencing submissions last month "Right now, I'm stuck (on) where to go... I have to start on my own."
Heinrichs said he took the colony's reaction into consideration when sentencing the man.
"In a way he has already felt the effect of his community's judgment against him," he said.
The man used rubbing alcohol to ply victims after putting a mask on them, an idea he reportedly picked up from a comic strip. He also would use plastic ties to restrain some of them to chairs inside the colony pig barn.

Man sentenced to two more years for sexual assaults
A 20-year-old man has been ordered to spend another two years in jail for repeated sexual assaults against several boys on a Manitoba Hutterite colony.
The accused – who can’t be named because some of his crimes happened when he was a youth – was seeking to be released from custody immediately with a sentence of nearly 12 months of time already served in custody. But provincial court Judge Robert Heinrichs said Monday more punishment is needed.
"This is the kind of serious and disturbing behaviour that calls out for denunciation and deterrence," he said.
Heinrichs also placed the man on three years of supervised probation with strict conditions, including having no contact with children under the age of 16. His name will also be placed on the national sex offender registry for a 20-year period.
The man pleaded guilty earlier this year to three counts of sexual interference and one count of forcible confinement. He was arrested last summer following a lengthy police investigation. Court documents alleged he abused 11 boys under the age of 14 during a seven-year span. Ultimately, he pleaded guilty to charges of abusing three boys between December 2006 and August 2009.
Court heard the Hutterite colony has told the man he's not welcome to return. Since the abuse came to light, his two brothers won't have anything to do with him.
"I've been kicked out of the colony," he said during sentencing submissions last month "Right now, I'm stuck (on) where to go... I have to start on my own."
The man used rubbing alcohol to ply victims after putting a mask on them, an idea he reportedly picked up from a comic strip. Prosecutor Jennifer Mann told court his actions showed the abuse wasn't a "spontaneous act."
However, defence lawyer Leonard Tailleur said he's contesting that because accusations the man performed and received oral sex during the abuse does not classify it as a major sexual assault. He also said his client was not in a position of trust or authority regarding the boys he targeted.
The lawyer said the strict religious setting of a Hutterite colony meant his client received corporal punishment and was put under house arrest when the abuse was discovered. The man has participated in programming in prison and is not considered a high risk to reoffend.

I completely disagree with two more years for this man. What purpose does prison serve? How does it help him? It doesn't. Prison should only be meant for those who pose a danger to society. This man does not. If he is committing sex crimes at such a young age, I suspect that he has been abused himself in childhood or because of his religion, has suppressed his sexual urges and emotions. This man could better benefit from counseling, and rehabilitation sex offender programs in the community through a conditional sentence. Prison should always be a last resort and needs to be relied upon less, to combat overcrowding. Deterrence is a myth, because most criminals are not rational, but impulsive and do not consider the consequences of their actions or the possibility of punishment.  

Saturday, July 3, 2010

Hutterite man who sexually abused boys should receive time served


A 20-year-old man accused of sexually assaulting boys on a Manitoba Hutterite colony told a sentencing hearing Friday he must rebuild his life after family and community members abandoned him.
The man has pleaded guilty to three counts of sexual interference and one count of forcible confinement.
He was arrested last summer. Court documents alleged he abused 11 boys under the age of 14 during a seven-year span. Ultimately, he pleaded guilty to charges of abusing three boys between December 2006 and August 2009.
Provincial court Judge Robert Heinrichs reserved his sentencing decision until July 19.
Court heard Friday the Hutterite colony has told the man he's not welcome to return. Since the abuse came to light, his two brothers won't have anything to do with him.
"I've been kicked out of the colony," he said. "Right now, I'm stuck (on) where to go... I have to start on my own."
The man's name cannot be published to protect the identify the victims of the attacks. Also, one of the charges against him falls under the Youth Criminal Justice Act.
Crown prosecutor Jennifer Mann told the court she is seeking a five-year prison sentence.
The man used rubbing alcohol to ply victims after putting a mask on them, an idea he reportedly picked up from a comic strip. Mann said his actions showed the abuse wasn't a "spontaneous act."
However, defence lawyer Leonard Tailleur said he's contesting that because accusations the man performed and received oral sex during the abuse does not classify it as a major sexual assault.
He also said his client was not in a position of trust or authority regarding the boys he targeted.
He argued his client, who's spent almost 11 months in prison, should be released with no more prison time.
The lawyer said the strict religious setting of a Hutterite colony meant his client received corporal punishment and was put under house arrest when the abuse was discovered.
The man has participated in programming in prison and is not considered a high risk to reoffend.

This man should receive time served and be released with no more prison time. He has participated in programming and is not a high risk to re-offend. I do not believe he is dangerous or violent and is not a threat to the public. Most sex offenders have been abused themselves or have gone through some traumatic experience. I would be interested in knowing more about this man's background. I feel sorry for him that his colony and family have disowned him completely and he is now left to fend for himself. I think that is punishment enough for this man. I also believe he should attend counseling to uncover what has happened to him in his past.  

Tuesday, May 18, 2010

Hutterite man pleads guilty to drugging and sexually assaulting boys on colony


A 19-year-old member of a Manitoba Hutterite colony has admitted to drugging, restraining and sexually abusing several boys over a prolonged period of time.
The accused – who can’t be named because some of his crimes occurred while he was a youth – will be sentenced June 25 on charges of sexual interference and forcible confinement.

He was arrested in August 2009 and has been in custody ever since. His lawyer is seeking a penalty of time spent in custody, while the Crown hasn’t said what they will be seeking. The man has no prior criminal record.

RCMP initially charged him with attacks against 11 boys between 2002 and 2009. However, he pleaded guilty Tuesday to crimes against just three victims between 2006 and 2009, with the Crown dropping the remaining charges.

Prosecutor Jennifer Mann told court they would have had difficulty proving some of the offences because the man may have been under the age of 12 when some of the crimes occurred, meaning the Criminal Code wouldn’t have applied to him.

Crown and defence lawyers submitted a joint statement-of-facts outlining the incidents on the colony in the Rural Municipality of Cartier. The Free Press is not naming the colony to protect the identity of the victims.
The accused admits he started sexually touching other boys at the colony when he was around 11 years of age and told police he would tie some of his victims to a chair and drug them with rubbing alcohol that he’d placed inside a mask they were forced to wear.
Many of the incidents happened inside a pig barn, court was told. One of the victims was just nine-years-old and told RCMP he was accosted by the accused at least 50 times.
The accused was not related to any of his victims and didn’t hold any position of trust over them, court was told. Police got a confession from the man following three lengthy interviews.

Hutterite teen guilty in multiple sex assaults
A 19-year-old member of a Manitoba Hutterite colony has admitted to years of sexual abuse against young boys, who were often drugged and physically restrained.
The man -- who can't be named because some of his crimes occurred while he was a youth -- pleaded guilty Tuesday to charges of sexual interference and forcible confinement. He will return to court June 25 following the completion of a pre-sentence report.

He was arrested in August 2009 and has been in custody ever since. His lawyer is seeking a penalty of time spent in custody, while the Crown hasn't said what it will be seeking. He has no prior criminal record.
RCMP initially charged the man with attacks against 11 boys between the ages of 8 and 14 over a seven-year period beginning in 2002. However, he pleaded guilty Tuesday to crimes against just three young victims between 2006 and 2009, with the Crown dropping the remaining charges.
Prosecutor Jennifer Mann told court they would have had difficulty proving many of the offences because the man was under the age of 13 when they occurred, meaning the Criminal Code wouldn't have applied to him.
Crown and defence lawyers submitted a joint statement of facts outlining the incidents on the colony in the Rural Municipality of Cartier. The Free Press is not naming the colony to protect the identity of the victims.
The accused admits he started sexually touching other boys at the colony when he was around 11 years of age and told police he would tie some of his victims to a chair and drug them with rubbing alcohol that he'd placed inside a mask they were forced to wear. Many of the incidents happened inside a pig barn and involved fondling and oral sex, court was told. One of the victims was just eight years old and told RCMP the accused accosted him at least 50 times, with the most recent incident happening just weeks before his arrest. The man admits he often wore gloves and a mask while carrying out his crimes.
The accused was not related to any of his victims and didn't hold any position of trust over them, court was told. Police got a confession from the man following three lengthy interviews. Justice officials haven't said why the chronic abuse was suddenly disclosed to police last year following years of secrecy.
A colony spokesperson told the Free Press last year how media attention surrounding the case is making it harder for members to deal with what happened. People from the closed society are not authorized to comment, he added.
Robert Rhodes, an author familiar with Hutterite living, said dealing with the police during the investigation has likely been a tough experience for them because of their limited interaction with the outside world.

Guilty plea in Hutterite sex abuse case

A young Manitoba man has pleaded guilty to committing acts of long-term sexual abuse against boys at a Hutterite colony.
The man, 19, pleaded guilty to three counts of sexual interference and a single count of forcible confinement during a hearing in Winnipeg on Tuesday.
He cannot be named under the provisions of the Youth Criminal Justice act, as one of the crimes happened when he was under 18 years-old.
He will be back in court on June 25 for sentencing.

'On approximately five occasions, the accused would make [the victim] wear a mask that smelled of an unknown substance and which gave him a headache.'—Agreed statement of facts

The man was arrested in August 2009 after RCMP began an investigation into alleged sex abuse on a Hutterite colony in the Rural Municipality of Cartier. He has been behind bars ever since and has never applied for bail.
His defence lawyer will ask the sentencing judge to give the man a time-served sentence, which would be the equivalent of about two years.
The Crown has not yet said what punishment it is seeking in the disturbing case.
The man was initially charged with 60 separate offences involving 10 victims, but the Crown stayed all but the four charges relating to three victims on Tuesday.
Prosecutor Jennifer Mann told court that a number of the charges were duplicates. In some of them there was no likelihood of conviction because the Crown couldn't conclusively prove how old he was when they happened.
Under the Criminal Code, only people aged 12 and over can be criminally charged.

Victims confined, drugged

According to an agreed statement of facts tendered in court, the man started sexually touching other boys at the colony when he was between 11 and 13 years old.
On some occasions he would tie them up and attempt to drug them into submission using rubbing alcohol.
One of the young victims told RCMP that he was 12 when he was tied to a chair in a pig barn at the colony and fondled.
Another victim said that starting in December 2008, the man "engaged in repeated sexual contact" with him, many times in the same pig barn. The victim, who was under 12, told investigators that the man would force him to wear rubber gloves during the incidents.
"If [the victim] did not want to wear rubber gloves, the accused would pin him down until he put them on," the statement of facts said. "As well, on approximately five occasions, the accused would make [the victim] wear a mask that smelled of an unknown substance and which gave him a headache."
The man would also wear gloves and a mask, the statement said.
The final incident happened one month prior to RCMP arresting the man. In an interview with police, the victim, 9, estimated that the man approached him between 50 and 75 times.
Five times, the boy said, he was confined to a chair with plastic ties and would be fondled.
"[The victim] disclosed that the accused would often use his fingers like pliers and pinch [the victim] all over his bum," the statement said.
Police managed to elicit information from the man about the crimes after three interviews with him after his arrest, the statement said.
He has no prior record.
None of the victims were related to him, the statement of facts said.
"There is no suggestion that the accused was in a position of trust or authority … [or] was a person with whom the complainants were in a relationship of dependency."
Police would not say what led them to investigate the colony, but the man's arrest came just weeks after RCMP in Manitou, Man., charged a 72-year-old man from another Hutterite colony, alleging similar crimes.
His case remains before the courts.


I would like to know more about the case, such as his level of remorse, any comments of the accused, and other defence lawyer arguments and any information on the background life of the accused such as if he has family, was abused himself, any addictions issues, or any other factors which could have contributed to this behaviour.

I cannot tell for sure if this man is a danger to society or if he should be imprisoned. He has already spent almost a year in prison awaiting his court date and I think that is enough jail time. He has no prior record. The article makes no mention of any mitigating factors or any possible causes of this man's behaviour, but I feel he should be given a conditional sentence or probation with strict conditions not to have any contact with the boys and to attend some sort of rehabilitative program for sex offenders and counseling for his underlying issues. The majority of teens who sexually assault others, have gone through some sort of traumatic experience as children, which is often being sexually assaulted themselves and they need help. This teen was only 11 years old when he started sexually abusing the children and that indicates something traumatic in his past, maybe he was abused himself. It also probably doesn't help, when Hutterites are sexually repressed and not allowed to express their sexuality. That can be hard for men and teens.  

Monday, May 17, 2010

Man on crime spree in Winnipeg, sentenced to 14 years in prison. Too harsh?


A Winnipeg man whose string of crimes included robbing a jail chaplain at knifepoint, holding another man hostage and terrorizing two real estate agents has been sentenced to 14 years in prison.
Raymond Michaud, 50, received credit of nine years for time served, reducing his remaining sentence to five years.
Michaud has spent almost his entire adult life behind bars. All his crimes are driven by his addiction to alcohol, said his lawyer Crystal Antila.
“He realizes he has wasted his life,” Antila told Judge Brent Stewart. “He is very ashamed. He can’t believe this even happened to him and he did this to these people.”
Michaud pleaded guilty to 10 offences including robbery with a weapon, forcible confinement, and breaking and entering.
In March 2005, Michaud and a second man, Ryan Grills, abducted a man who owed them money for a drug debt and threw him in the trunk of their car. Michaud and Grills called the abducted man’s father and arranged a rendezvous east of the city where they would release his son in exchange for the $600 drug debt. The man was released unharmed.


In a second incident, Michaud and Grills, both former inmates of Headingley Correctional Centre, lured the jail chaplain to Grill’s home on the pretext of paying back money he had loaned them. Grills held a gun to the chaplain’s head while Michaud held a knife to his throat before robbing him of his wallet, car keys and bank card.
The victim was driven to a downtown bank machine where he was forced to withdraw $800.

A day later the men called an automobile dealership and arranged for a salesman to pick them up for a test drive at a North End 7-Eleven. Michaud and Grills hijacked the man and his car and then robbed a party supply store and health food store of a small amount of cash.

Later that day the men lured a married couple, both real estate agents, to a North End address on the pretext of wanting to buy a house. After some bogus chit-chat in the couple’s car, Grills put a gun to the man’s head and Michaud held a knife on the woman’s head.

Following a brief struggle during which the woman suffered minor wounds to her hand, the men grabbed her purse and ran off.

Michaud also pleaded guilty to two residential break and enters committed prior to his crime spree with Grills.
Grills, 35, was sentenced in 2007 to 12 years in prison.
Michaud’s road to sentencing was much longer, due in part to the sudden death of the Crown attorney first assigned to prosecute the case. In 2009 the case was further delayed when Michaud abruptly fired his lawyer.

First of all, I have compassion for this man because of his addiction issues. They are the driving force behind all of his crimes. Based on the information in the article, this man definitely has committed a lot of crime and appears to be a danger to society, due to his random attacks. For that reason, I believe a prison sentence is warranted in this case. However, I do not feel 14 years is warranted as that seems too harsh. But with the double time credit in effect, I feel that the remaining 5 years left for this man to serve, is relatively appropriate and fair. I would feel much better about the prison sentence if prison reforms took place and conditions were improved along with more emphasis on rehabilitation and reform, as opposed to the current negative environment and lack of program funding. It would be beneficial for this man to participate in a substance abuse program in prison, and also a community based program when he is released on parole or stat release. 

For many crimes, I feel that substance abuse and addictions issues should be dealt with outside of a prison sentence, however, this man exhibits extreme violence in his random attacks. Some of the attacks, also appeared to be premeditated, which is definitely an aggravating factor. I only hope that this man can receive the help he needs either while in prison or when he is released and that the effects of prison will not have too much of an adverse effect on his life and for his chances of rehabilitation.  

Friday, April 16, 2010

Accused teen in school sex abuse case, granted bail


WINNIPEG - Manitoba justice officials have agreed to release an 18-year-old man from jail following his arrest earlier this week on sexual assault charges connected to St. John's-Ravenscourt School.
The man was granted bail Friday morning, with the consent of the Crown attorney, on several strict conditions including a $10,000 surety, nightly curfew of 10 p.m. and an order to turn over his passport to Winnipeg police. He must also have no contact with any current SJR students. The man, who is originally from China, has no prior criminal record.

The Free Press is not naming the suspect to avoid identifying the alleged victim, who was his roommate at the private boarding school.
The suspect's release comes after three youth co-accused were granted bail – despite objections from the Crown – Thursday afternoon at the Manitoba Youth Centre.
Police are continuing to investigate and are expected to make at least two more arrests, court was told. Police say they will be interviewing other potential victims and further charges could be laid.
All four have been charged with sexual assault with a weapon, forcible confinement, and uttering threats. It's alleged the senior boarding students threatened the younger male boarders, holding them down and placing a wooden stick against their buttocks, in incidents that took place between September and December. As many as 15 students may have been targeted.
The Winnipeg Police child-abuse and sex-crimes units are handling the investigation.
Two of the accused voluntarily withdrew from the school Tuesday after a disciplinary committee recommended expulsion. Two more, who were suspended for five days last week, will not be allowed to return to school until CFS officials clear it.
A justice source told the Free Press the charges announced Thursday relate to a single incident involving a roommate of one of the four teen suspects. The charges came to light only after an SJR teacher allegedly overheard a remark made by a student that led to further questions, said the source.

This article implies that the youth should have been held in custody, however; I feel that this was the right decision in granting him bail, as he has no prior record and is subject to strict conditions. There is no reason to hold him in custody. It's more likely to cause more criminal behaviour anyways. Prison is damaging.

Rush to injustice? 
Rush to injustice?
We are witnessing a media and legal feeding frenzy over alleged sexual assault by students at St. John's Ravenscourt School. Perhaps we should slow down on a rush to injustice.
Perhaps we should consider that not all legally defined sexual assault is of the same nature. Perhaps we are imagining, and the media are implying, much worse behaviour than actually took place.
Perhaps we should consider that many adolescents act irresponsibly at times and in hurtful ways that do not lead to lasting harm. Perhaps they require some punishment and rebuke to correct their behaviour, and discourage others to act the same, but should that involve jail?
Perhaps we should consider the harm done to children chewed up and spat out by the gears of the legal system, lubricated by the mainstream media. Everyone seems to love a scandalous story to show how compassionate they are.
Perhaps much more harm is being done now than anything that occurred prior to this media and legal frenzy.
Perhaps none of us yet know what really happened, but we imagine all sorts of terrible things that likely did not occur.
Perhaps cool and reasonable heads will prevail and justice will be done.
I cannot say that I am optimistic. Political correctness, when mixed with superior moralizing and cynical media obsession, rarely leads to anything good.

Four teens charged in the alleged sexual assault of fellow students at a Winnipeg private school have been released from jail.
They were arrested Wednesday as part of a police investigation into several alleged incidents at St. John's-Ravenscourt.
All four accused — two aged 16, one who is 17, and one who is 18 — were students at the prestigious school in Winnipeg's Wildwood neighbourhood.
They have each been charged with sexual assault with a weapon, forcible confinement, and uttering threats.
CBC News has also learned the police may be looking for two more suspects in the case.
The investigation is continuing by the police service's child abuse unit and sex crimes unit.
As part of their release, the teens face strict conditions, which prohibit them from having any contact with other SJR students.
They are also required to abide by a curfew from 10 p.m. to 7 a.m. and pay a $10,000 surety.
The 18-year-old, who is a landed immigrant, has also surrendered his passport and moved into a home belonging to family friends in Winnipeg.

Threats of sodomy

The alleged assaults date back to last fall but only came to light last week.
Neither the school nor the police have revealed the nature of the incidents, but CBC News has learned they allegedly involved threats of sodomy toward younger students by the four who have been charged.
The older boys allegedly pinned the younger ones on the floor and removed their pants. A walking stick was allegedly held near the anus of each victim.
Court documents filed in regard to the adult's case confirm that police believe the victims were forcibly confined and assaulted with a "wooden stick."
As many as 15 students were reportedly abused.
All of the boys involved — the accused and the alleged victims — were boarders at the school, which goes from kindergarten to Grade 12. The alleged victims were in Grades 8 to 10, CBC News has been told.

Four male students have been charged with sexual assault at St. John's-Ravenscourt private school in Winnipeg.
The students — two 16-year-olds, a 17-year-old and an 18-year-old — have all been charged with sexual assault with a weapon, forcible confinement, and uttering threats, police said Thursday.
Three of the students are youths who are in custody at the Manitoba Youth Centre.
The 18-year-old is at the Winnipeg Remand Centre. The young man appeared briefly in court by a video link from an interview room at the jail Thursday morning on the expectation he would apply for bail.
'He's sitting in a jail for the very first time in his life, so it's expected that he'll be a little bit unsettled by that experience.'—Defence lawyer Sheldon Pinx
However, the presiding judge agreed to the Crown's request for more time to prepare for the hearing. Information about the case had only been forwarded by police to prosecutors about 10 minutes prior to his appearance, court was told.
The Crown will oppose his release, and the judge heard that prosecutors will argue that releasing the man would harm the public's confidence in the justice system.
Being behind bars will likely be jarring for the young man, defence lawyer Sheldon Pinx said.
"My client is only 18," Pinx said. "Needless to say, he's never been involved in the justice system before ... he's sitting in a jail for the very first time in his life, so it's expected that he'll be a little bit unsettled by that experience."
A special hearing will be held Friday for the man to apply for bail. The youths charged will appear in youth court at 2 p.m. Thursday.
The investigation is continuing by the police service's child abuse unit and sex crimes unit, and additional charges are pending.

Victims confined by force: police

The alleged assaults date back to last fall but only came to light last week, according to SJR headmaster Stephen Johnson.
Neither the school nor the police have revealed the nature of the incidents, but CBC News has learned they allegedly involved threats of sodomy toward younger students by the four who have been charged.
The older boys allegedly pinned the younger ones on the floor and removed their pants. A walking stick was allegedly held near the anus of a victim as he was threatened with sodomy. Court documents filed in regard to the adult's case confirm that police believe the victims were forcibly confined and assaulted with a "wooden stick."
As many as 15 students were reportedly abused.
All of the boys involved — the accused and the alleged victims — were boarders at the school, which goes from kindergarten to Grade 12. The alleged victims were in Grades 8 to 10, CBC News has been told.

Suspensions indefinite

The four students were immediately suspended when the school learned of the allegations last Friday.
School administrators contacted Winnipeg police earlier this week. The provincial Department of Child and Family Services is also involved.
Two of the students were told by school officials Monday they would be expelled, but were given the option to appeal or voluntarily withdraw.
They chose to leave on their own and complete their courses online or by mail, officials said, noting the boys would not receive diplomas from the school but rather a Manitoba high school certificate if they graduate.
The two other students, whom police said are from out of province, were initially given a five-day suspension.
However, Johnson said on Thursday that the suspensions have been extended indefinitely. Even if granted bail by the courts, they will not be allowed back to school, Johnson said.
Of the two students expelled, one was originally an international boarder but his family now lives in Winnipeg. The other is from Alberta.

Confidence shaken

Many parents who spoke with CBC News about the incidents believe the school is still a safe place and commended administrators and staff for taking such quick action.
But the confidence of at least one parent has been shaken. Yan Jiang is having second thoughts about registering her eight-year-old son at SJR.
'I can't tell you this is a safe place for your son or somebody else's son … until we do a debrief of how this happened'—SJR headmaster Stephen Johnson
"If the school is not safe, what's the point of sending your son to a place that is in danger?" she said.
Even Johnson said he can't give Jiang any assurances. The fact the boarding students kept the alleged incidents a secret for so many months means something went terribly wrong, he said.
"I can't tell you this is a safe place for your son or somebody else's son … until we do a debrief of how this happened," he said.
"We're not going to know until we … start talking about the details of what each of those boys felt and why they couldn't come forward."
Administrators are taking steps to try to prevent such incidents in the future. That includes counselling for students on how to deal with any situations they encounter.
The school is located at 400 South Dr., on the banks of the Red River, in the city's Wildwood neighbourhood.
According to its website, the school has 830 students with boarding arrangements available for about 50 students.
The cost to board at the prestigious school, which dates back to 1820, ranged in the current academic year from $30,000 to $40,000 per student.
Tuition for students who attended the school but did not board there ranged from $13,000 to nearly $17,000, depending on their grade level.

Charges in school sex abuse case

THE allegations at St. John's-Ravenscourt School are pretty much off the charts for the 50,000 students who board at 300 of the top elite private schools in North America.
"Criminal charges being brought against students is very unusual," said Pete Upham, executive director of the Association of Boarding Schools (TABS) from Asheville, N.C. "If what's alleged took place, it's awful."
Upham said that while private boarding schools have zero tolerance for hazing or bullying, he could not recall any cases in recent years in Canada or the U.S. that involved allegations and charges as serious as those at SJR.
Both SJR and Winnipeg's Balmoral Hall School for girls are members of TABS. "There's no such thing as perfect security. When you're working with young people, there's no absolute fail-safe way of preventing bad behaviour," Upham said.
Upham said boarding schools typically have two students per room, generally of the same age, if possible. There is both adult supervision on-site as well as senior students serving as proctors or prefects.
Schools vary from one supervising adult per three or four boarding students, to a maximum of about one per 30 students. These adults are often professionals who teach and/or coach at the school.
"Faculty and other adults live in the dormitories and directly supervise the dormitories," he said. "The standard practice is that primary on-site supervision would be by qualified staff."
An apartment-like residence would likely have an adult living on each floor, while a house-like residence would have a living unit set aside for the adult supervisor. Student proctors are there to help and to develop student leadership, but they are clearly to assist adults, not be in charge, Upham said.
Upham said he worked in private boarding schools for 12 years, living in the dorm. "There was a team approach," he said. Upham or another adult would set up a desk in the hallway until the dorm was locked up for the night, checking in on students and ensuring there were no problems.
Adult supervisors would carry cellphones for emergencies, and students could come to their rooms to get help at any hour of the night, he said.
The TABS website says such schools provide among the best educations in North America, attracting students more interested in working hard than the average student.
TABS considers boarding schools "college preparatory" schools -- experiences that better prepare students to go on to post-secondary, and treat students as young adults.
Balmoral Hall School officials did not respond to interview requests about the school's boarding practices and policies.
The Ontario-based Canadian Association of Independent Schools, to which SJR belongs, did not respond to an interview request.

‘Whatever happened was serious, they didn’t talk about it, and they didn’t talk about it for a long time, and that’s a problem’ -- Stephen Johnson, head of St. John’s-Ravencourt School
The allegations surrounding an elite private school in Winnipeg are not what you'd expect from a storied institution at which boarding students pay up to $40,000 a year to attend.
According to reports emerging from the well-groomed campus in Fort Garry, senior male boarding students at St. John's-Ravenscourt School forced younger schoolmates to the ground and held a stick up against their buttocks. Already, two students have left the school voluntarily after a disciplinary committee called for their expulsion.

 What happened at
St. John’s-Ravenscourt:
A timeline

Wednesday, April 7:
A day student tells a St. John's-Ravenscourt teacher about the alleged assaults, who then tells the senior school principal.
Thursday, April 8:
Four male boarding students are suspended in connection to the allegations.
Friday, April 9:
SJR parents receive a letter telling them they had information suggesting "students were assaulting other students in boarding." It instructs them "there is no evidence to suggest that this is part of any long-running hazing practice." The letter tells parents about the four suspensions, and that two of those students were referred to the school's disciplinary committee.
Wednesday, April 7 until Sunday, April 11:
School officials contact their legal counsel and parents of the children involved. The school's senior school principal conducts an internal investigation.
Sunday, April 11:
The senior school principal goes to a police station to report her findings.
Tuesday, April 13:
The school's head says he can't comment on allegations of sex assault, saying the incidents happened last fall involving a "range of behaviour (that) goes from bullying to assault." The police do not confirm a sexual assault investigation, but say the child abuse unit is in charge. Two boys leave the school after they appear before a disciplinary committee and school officials recommend expulsion.
Wednesday, April 14:
The Free Press reports there are at least two male victims involved in a sexual assault investigation. Reports emerge that as many as 15 boys were targeted last fall in a series of incidents. The school's head says there are at least four victims, but does not confirm the investigation involves sexual assault.
Two other male students are serving suspensions in connection to the incidents, which are making headlines across the country.
Child and Family Services will be looking into the alleged incidents that may have included as many as 15 victims, and an investigation by the Winnipeg Police Service child abuse unit is already under way.
Stephen Johnson, head of St. John's-Ravenscourt, said two Grade 12 students are no longer at the school after reports of abuse surfaced. Johnson said he could not comment on allegations boys were sexually assaulted with items like sticks, citing the ongoing police investigation.
"I have to stand back now and let (police) do their job, and not interfere, just support and do whatever they want us to do, and just hope that it will be done expeditiously," Johnson said.
"Everybody wants to know, especially the families of the kids affected in particular," he said.
Johnson said the alleged abuse happened during the fall term of the current school year.
He said he now must regain the trust of students and their families.
"Whatever happened was serious, they didn't talk about it, and they didn't talk about it for a long time, and that's a problem," said Johnson. "In terms of whether the boys were fearful of retribution, whether there was a code of secrecy, whether they didn't think adults would do anything, clearly something painful or awful was happening."
At least four male boarding students in grades eight, nine, 10 and 11 were victimized, he said.
Three alleged perpetrators are boarding students in Grade 12 and one is in Grade 11.
Johnson would not comment on reports from parents that as many as 15 students were victimized, or what allegedly happened to them.
"I think the challenge has been, with our board of governors and some of the parents who are big supporters of the school, or involved with our parents association, there's a real tension between how much to talk about and how little to talk about," he said. "Some of the people are very experienced in the business world, or in public life, where they know the role of the press, they know the role of information, and they know the power of reputation.
"And it's very difficult... to steer a middle course with the ultimate aim of protecting the kids and their families."
Johnson said CFS officials could be at the school as early as Friday.
"I'd like the police to wrap up their investigation tomorrow and say, 'Here, this is it. Done.' And we'll say, 'Fine, thank you.' And we'll use that as the basis for our further review, further study, further counselling support," Johnson said.
A four-day wait before school officials contacted police was not excessive, he said, adding the decision to involve officers was guided by a lawyer.
"I've erred on the side of being -- I'm sure it will be perceived as very conservative in terms of information release -- and that's all been done with legal advice about, 'You've got to protect the kids, you can't defame a student who hasn't been charged by virtue of a letter that suggests something, so don't say that or else his lawyer's going to be suing the school.' So I can't," Johnson said. "Nothing will be covered up."
Johnson said two of the boarding students will be finished their five-day suspensions today.
However, he said it's unknown if those students will return to live in the dorms. Officials are awaiting the results of the police investigation before they make that decision, Johnson said.
"There's a fair bit of concern among the boys... are they safe if these two guys come back," he said.
The school has about 50 boarding students. About 830 attend the school.
A letter sent to parents Wednesday said two students voluntarily withdrew from the school after the disciplinary committee recommended expulsion.
"We continue to provide counselling to our staff and students and review our procedures in house to make sure something like this never happens again," said the letter. Johnson said no parents have said they're withdrawing their students from SJR yet in light of recent revelations about the abuse.
Johnson said one boy, who is 18, did not bring his parents to the disciplinary committee meeting. The other Grade 12 student brought his parents, who live outside Manitoba.
"(The parents) are stunned... they don't know what to say," said Johnson.
"I said, 'You've got to spend some time with your son now. He's done some serious things.'"
Johnson said that indicates to him the evidence presented to the parents was "overwhelmingly compelling."
"Usually as a parent, you're going to fight for your kid's right to stay in the school," he said.

WINNIPEG - Four students from an exclusive private Winnipeg school face charges that include sexual assault with a weapon.
Police spokeswoman Const. Jacqueline Chaput said the suspects are between 16 and 18-years-old and are being held in custody. The alleged victims are in Grades 8, 9 and 10.

"The males have all been charged with ... sexual assault with a weapon, forcible confinement and uttering threats," Chaput said Thursday.
"The three youth suspects were detained at the Manitoba Youth Centre, and the 18-year-old suspect was detained at the Winnipeg Remand Centre."
Allegations surfaced last week that several younger boarders at St. John's Ravenscourt School had been abused in what one school official called organized bullying.
The four suspects are from outside Manitoba.
Chaput said the police child abuse and sex crime units continue to investigate and additional charges are pending.
Four students were suspended last week after the accusations were first raised. Two of the students withdrew from the school rather than be expelled. Everyone on both sides of the investigation is a boarding student.
The complaints go back to last fall.
St. John's-Ravenscourt has 830 students enrolled in classes from kindergarten to Grade 12 and boarding students in Grade 8 and up. Tuition fees range up to $37,000 a year.
The school says about half of its boarders are from outside Canada, including Chile, China, Germany, Hong Kong, Japan, Korea, Mexico, Nigeria and Taiwan.

Secrecy is the lifeblood of abuse and breaking through the wall of silence is a formidable challenge. The experience of St. John's-Ravenscourt is not a new phenomenon for educational institutions, nor is it particularly surprising. It is instructive, however, for all schools, and especially for those with residential components.
The dismay of SJR's head of school, Stephen Johnson, about the time it has taken for the disclosure of attacks that allegedly took place last fall is understandable. The nature of the acts is grave -- four students are facing charges of sexual assault with a weapon and confinement. There were numerous victims. How could such abuse touch the lives of so many young boarders without word leaking out? The affair came to light this month when a day school student confided in a teacher.
SJR's experience, however, should spark introspection among all institutions that board, teach or have a duty of care for children. Environments where children choose to, or must congregate, are attractive to those who would harm them. The work to protect children must reflect the fact abusers wield an insidious power over their victims that engages a pact of silence.
This fact is part of the anti-violence education that has gone on in public institutions that cater to children. Manitoba's Safe Schools Charter demands all publicly funded schools have committees responsible for preparing protocol that informs the zero-tolerance policy for violence, including bullying. There is no requirement for a protocol to help children report, however.
The work there is tough slogging. It requires the building of relationships that give students who are preyed upon the strength to face down intimidation, embarrassment and fear of reprisal to disclose to an adult. That can be made easier by anonymous routes for feedback, such as drop boxes and chat lines.
It took a long time for SJR to hear of what may have been an organized attack on young boarding students. Prevention is a work in progress but key to stopping abuse is a sophisticated blend of education, anonymous reporting and trusting student-teacher relationships that defeats the pact of silence that protects the abusers.

Thursday, April 1, 2010

Man sentenced for sexually assaulting former girlfriend


A Winnipeg man was sentenced Thursday to four years in prison for stabbing and sexually assaulting a former girlfriend after she spurned his repeated demands for anal sex.

Convicted last September, Daniel Olenick was taken into custody by provincial sheriff’s officers as soon as Court of Queen’s Bench Justice Colleen Suche delivered the sentence at Winnipeg’s Law Courts building.

His back to the court gallery and slouched in his chair, Olenick rested his head in his right hand and bounced his right leg up and down while Suche called the crime disgusting and explained her decision.

“Whatever its roots, something is seriously wrong with Mr. Olenick,” Suche said.
Now 49, the victim didn’t attend the sentencing.

Olenick, 47, defended himself at his trial and was convicted of sexual assault, assault causing bodily harm and forcible confinement in the February 2006 incident.

For the sexual assault, Suche sentenced Olenick to four years. On the other two counts, he was given a combined two-year sentence to be served concurrent to the four-year sentence.
She agreed with defence lawyer Daniel Manning’s suggestion of four years.
The Crown was seeking a 10-year sentence.
Suche said sentences of that length are usually given to people who have a history of violence. Olenick had no previous criminal record.
Suche found trouble with the fact Olenick maintains his innocence.
She said the violent episode had a grand emotional toll on the victim, who experienced feelings of betrayal, shame, and fear, and a loss of self-confidence, in addition to physical injuries.
The incident occurred days after Olenick’s then-girlfriend moved into his Point Douglas home.
Court heard the couple had been drinking, smoking crack and arguing before Olenick tied her to a staircase bannister with twine and stabbed her in the arm, hip, abdomen and back.
Olenick untied her, had her cook food for him, and later dragged her to a bedroom and raped her, court was told.
Olenick represented himself at his trial, which resulted in him cross-examining the victim.
The woman told court she felt “raped all over again” by the cross-examination.

I suppose I agree with the sentence of 4 years but I also find it troubling that he maintains his innocence. What if he is innocent? He has no prior record and is a low risk to re-offend, which are mitigating circumstances. I would have liked to have known other background issues, such as employment, poverty, etc. Personally, I feel that between 2-3 years would be more appropriate, but 4 is close enough. 

Wednesday, March 31, 2010

Victim felt 'raped all over again'


A Winnipeg man whose former girlfriend said she felt “raped all over again” as he personally cross-examined her during his trial last fall should be sentenced to the maximum allowable jail term for a sexual assault, the Crown suggested Wednesday.

Daniel Olenick, 47, was convicted last September of sex assault and forcible confinement in relation to a February 2006 incident that saw him tie up and stab his girlfriend, then later rape her inside the Point Douglas home the couple began sharing just a few days before the attack.

Crown prosecutor Mike Desautels told court during Olenick’s sentencing hearing Wednesday that the attack was “so far off the deep end it defies explanation.”

Court heard the couple had been drinking, smoking crack cocaine and arguing the day of the incident when Olenick suddenly decided to grab the woman and bind her to a staircase bannister with twine. He then grabbed a steak knife, held it to her throat and stabbed her in the arm, hip, abdomen and back.

“She was like Swiss cheese by the end of it,” Desautels said Wednesday.
Olenick then untied her and forced her to cook him some food. He later became enraged again, dragged her to the bedroom and raped her.

Olenick represented himself at his trial last fall, which resulted in him cross-examining his victim about his own actions — with disastrous results.
The woman told court she felt “raped all over again” by the cross-examination and said she’d made a mistake allowing him to question her.
In cases of a self-represented accused, the Crown can be required to call evidence showing why it’s necessary to have a lawyer appointed to cross-examine a victim. In this case, the woman agreed to allow Olenick to act alone.

At one point Justice Colleen Suche said the trial was turning into “chaos” and that the pair were acting “worse than warring children.”
Desautels asked Suche Wednesday to sentence Olenick, who remains free on bail, to a 10-year global sentence for his crimes. That is the maximum allowable for a common sex assault conviction.

Olenick’s lawyer Dan Manning suggested four years for the sex assault with a year concurrent for the confinement charge, arguing the man has no record to speak of and is a low risk to re-offend.
The victim, now 49, did not attend Wednesday’s hearing.
Suche is expected to render her decision Thursday.

First of all, I would like to know why the victim felt 'raped all over again' as the article did not explain what exactly he asked her that was so wrong. The article did not explain the background info / life hardships of the accused that may have contributed or played a role, in his decision to commit this act (unemployment, poverty, addictions, etc.). 

If he has no prior record and is a low risk to re-offend, I agree with his lawyer in that he should be sentenced to 4 years in prison, for the purpose of denunciation and because this was a violent attack. If he has done well on complying with his bail conditions, this would also be reason to sentence him more lightly. In my opinion, I think that 2 years would be even more appropriate than 4.   

Wednesday, March 24, 2010

Alleged tanning peeper, is charged again, suggesting a non-isolated previous attack

Stands accused of voyeurism, sex assaults

IT was a shocking crime at a downtown Winnipeg tanning salon -- a young woman accosted in a private room by an unknown intruder who had scaled a wall to spy on her.
Now, evidence is mounting to suggest this was not an isolated attack. Winnipeg police have expanded their investigation and laid a slew of new criminal charges against the alleged voyeur believed to be responsible for the November 2009 incident.
Russel Bruce Cassels, 29, is now accused of sexually assaulting and secretly videotaping two former girlfriends over a lengthy period of time, according to court documents obtained by the Free Press.
One of the women claims she was attacked between June 2008 and August 2009, while the other has cited incidents between July 2009 and February 2010.
On Tuesday, Winnipeg Police Service spokesman Const. Rob Carver said two women recently came forward to shed new light on the existing police probe.
"This is a fairly extensive set of circumstances. We would be casting the net very broad, certainly looking to see where else offences may have been committed and against whom," Carver said.
Cassels was first arrested Dec. 4 and charged with an incident at TanFX that happened days earlier. The 20-year-old woman began screaming for help and the suspect responded by pushing down the lid of the tanning bed so she couldn't escape.
He then fled the facility, located in the underground Winnipeg Square at 360 Main St.
The victim was emotionally traumatized but not physically injured.
Police charged Cassels with voyeurism, break and enter, forcible confinement and a break and enter-related charge. He was released on bail days later, despite objections from the Crown.
Police seized a cellular phone from the accused which allegedly contained a database of several city addresses which included "shower times" for some of the female residents.
Police began visiting several homes in early December to speak with the occupants. A 21-year-old woman said police showed up at her Osborne Village residence to inform her the house she shares with four roommates was on the list.
None of the women had ever seen the accused before. No additional charges have been laid to this point involving those incidents.
Cassels was rearrested on Feb. 23 after allegedly breaching conditions of his bail by assaulting one of his ex-girlfriends. He was granted bail the next day, with the Crown once again opposed.
Police continued to investigate and uncovered additional evidence involving the girlfriend, and another former partner who came forward. Cassels was arrested again on March 12 and has been in custody ever since. His new charges include two more counts of voyeurism, forcible confinement, sexual assault and assault.

Man charged in tanning booth invasion
Tanning booth intruder charged with voyeurism
Alleged peeper had 'shower times' list: police; Tanning salon suspect probed


When I look at the type of attacks and activities that this man has been doing and planning, I see a potential sex offender. Someday, spying on women might not arouse his as much, causing him to move on based on his fantasies, towards sexually assaulting, kidnapping and possibly even killing women. Sex offenders start off with relatively minor crimes and move along a continuum. What I want to know, is why this man was released on bail, TWICE?! Especially after he breached the conditions of his first bail received? It baffles me but at least he is in custody now. 

Thursday, March 18, 2010

"Sex offender denied bid for quick release"


A violent Manitoba sex offender deemed a high-risk to reoffend lost his bid to be immediately released back into the community.

Clayton Dixon has been in custody since his December 2006 arrest. He argued he shouldn't face any further sanctions for his latest crimes on two women.

But Queen's Bench Justice Morris Kaufman disagreed Wednesday, ordering him to spend another 11 months behind bars. He was given double-time credit for his pre-trial custody, meaning his sentence on paper is seven and-a-half-years.

Dixon, 40, was convicted at trial last year of numerous charges including two counts of sexual assault, assault causing bodily harm, uttering threats, forcible confinement and mischief. He has a lengthy criminal history spanning more than two decades.

The Crown was seeking a 10-year sentence -- the maximum allowed by law -- but Kaufman said Dixon didn't meet the criteria for such a designation.

Dixon repeatedly beat a middle-aged woman inside a home in Norway House, 450 kilometres north of Winnipeg. She tried to flee into a bedroom for safety, but Dixon kicked down the door and began sexually assaulting her. The woman managed to flee to a neighbouring home and call for help.
"This was a very horrific and violent sexual assault," Crown attorney Richard Smith told court Wednesday.

Dixon wasn't finished with his rampage. He began attacking a 15-year-old girl who was also in the home, assaulting her and attempting to kiss her. RCMP burst into the home and interrupted what they believe was going to be another serious sexual assault.
"The police came in to save the day," said Smith. Both victims were treated for various injuries.

Defence lawyer Gord Bates said his client was raised by his grandparents in a dysfunctional environment on the northern Manitoba reserve. Dixon's grandmother was abusive "and basically taught him he was useless," he said. Dixon has long struggled with drug and alcohol addiction, which has impacted his judgment.

Dixon has had a difficult time in jail since his arrest because he is labelled a "skinner" by other inmates for trying to sexually assault the teen victim.
Bates said his client plans to resume living with his common-law wife and their three children once he is released from jail. He will be on supervised probation for two years with conditions including having no unsupervised contact with children under the age of 18. His name will also be placed on the federal sex offender registry.

The acts that this man committed were horrible and degrading but I understand the situational factors that may have influenced these crimes such as dysfunctional family life, and addictions. I feel that he should have been sentenced to 5 years instead of 7.5 years. 

Saturday, February 20, 2010

Russell Williams honours man for homicide investigation weeks before his crime spree began



Col. Russell Williams, the former commander of CFB Trenton charged in two homicides and two sex assaults, honoured a military investigator for his work at a homicide scene on the Ontario base last summer – just weeks before Williams’ alleged crime spree began. 

Gave Cpl. Tim Thickson the highest honour on a base – for what was described as outstanding professionalism in initiating an emergency response at a murder scene. 

“I find it so sad that the same guy who is alleged to have committed these acts presents one of his soldiers with an award for the work he did at the crime scene,” a tipster wrote. 

The military honour recognizes Thickson for ensuring “the security of the crime scene and of other emergency response personnel who were attempting to revive the victim while the murder suspect was at large in the area.” 

Williams, 46, is charged with two counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of Cpl. Marie-France Comeau and Jessica Lloyd. He is also charged with two counts each of forcible confinement, break-and-enter and sexual assault in attacks on women during home invasions Sept. 17 and 30. 

Williams, in custody since his arrest Feb. 7, made a brief video appearance Thursday in a Belleville, Ont., courtroom.
His case was put over until March 25 while awaiting disclosure. 

This is very ironic!