Welcome to my Crime and Justice blog! I am a 19 year old criminal justice student at the University of Winnipeg. I advocate for prisoners' rights, human rights, equality and criminal justice/prison system reforms.

Saturday, June 5, 2010

Denying Li supervised walks is "political pandering" -- completely unacceptable


A group representing more than 4,000 Canadian psychiatrists has condemned the province's decision to prevent Vince Li from taking short supervised outdoor strolls, calling it "the worst kind of political pandering and fear-mongering."
In a letter to the Free Press, the Canadian Psychiatric Association said Justice Minister Andrew Swan's reaction to a review board's "carefully considered" decision to grant a "slight increase" in Li's liberty demonstrates "a shocking lack of knowledge and understanding of mental illness."
The letter was written by the association's president Dr. Stanley Yaren, who has treated Li and is also director of the Winnipeg Regional Health Authority's adult forensic psychiatry program. He stressed in an interview that his comments were made in his capacity as head of the national association.
Li was found not criminally responsible last year for the 2008 beheading of 22-year-old Tim McLean on a Greyhound bus near Portage la Prairie. A judge ruled Li was suffering from hallucinations and untreated schizophrenia at the time of the attack.
On Thursday, the Criminal Code Review Board ruled Li could receive outdoor passes twice daily from the locked forensic unit at the Selkirk Mental Health Centre as long as he was accompanied by two staff members. However, Swan immediately vetoed the outings -- calling them "contrary to the interests of public safety" -- until the centre beefs up security measures.
"Mr. Swan joins those members of the public who would return to the days when the mentally ill were cast out of society to be incarcerated in prisons and asylums, never to see the light of day," Yaren said in his letter.
In an interview Friday, Yaren said he found Swan's reaction "quite outrageous" and surprising, considering that earlier in the week, in response to Opposition critics, the minister expressed reluctance to interfere in the review board process.
Yaren said that Swan's action and comments Thursday also seem to signal a change in government philosophy.
"His predecessor, David Chomiak, was really quite a champion for the mentally ill and also as justice minister. So there seems to be a turnabout in the whole philosophy of the government that's being espoused," he said.
In an email through an intermediary on Friday, Swan reiterated his position that public safety must be the paramount concern.
"We respect the Criminal Code Review Board and the need to ensure the ability of those deemed not criminally responsible to recover and potentially begin a process of reintegration into society after an appropriate period of treatment," he said. "However, it is our view that this order -- taken a mere two years since this terrible crime was committed -- is contrary to the interests of public safety and seriously undermines public confidence in the Canadian justice system."
Mental health advocates have been critical of politicians of all political stripes, saying their reaction to the Li decision has been stigmatizing and hurtful to people with mental disorders and their families.
But Conservative Leader Hugh McFadyen said Friday decisions on Li's treatment need to "take into account the need to balance public safety and compassion for somebody with a mental illness.
"We believe that in the circumstances of this case that public safety should come first."

Psychiatrists blast Manitoba for interfering in bus beheader`s treatment
WINNIPEG — A group representing more than 4,000 Canadian psychiatrists has condemned the Manitoba government's decision to prevent infamous killer Vince Li from taking short supervised outdoor strolls, calling it "the worst kind of political pandering and fear mongering."
In a letter to the Winnipeg Free Press, the Canadian Psychiatric Association said provincial Justice Minister Andrew Swan's reaction to a review board's "carefully considered" decision to a "slight increase" in Li's liberty demonstrates "a shocking lack of knowledge and understanding of mental illness."
Li was found not criminally responsible last year for beheading and cannibalizing 22-year-old Tim McLean in front of horrified passengers on a Greyhound bus near Portage la Prairie, Man., in 2008.
A judge ruled Li was suffering from hallucinations and untreated schizophrenia at the time of the attack.
On Thursday, the Criminal Code Review Board ruled Li could receive outdoor passes twice daily from the locked forensic unit at the Selkirk Mental Health Centre as long as he is accompanied by two staff members.
However, Swan immediately vetoed the outings — calling them "contrary to the interests of public safety" — until the centre beefs up security measures.
The psychiatrists' letter of protest was written by association president Dr. Stanley Yaren, who has treated Li and is also director of the Winnipeg Regional Health Authority's adult forensic psychiatry program.
He stressed in an interview that his comments were made in his capacity as head of the national association.
"Mr. Swan joins those members of the public who would return to the days when the mentally ill were cast out of society to be incarcerated in prisons and asylums, never to see the light of day," Yaren said in his letter.
In an interview Friday, Yaren said he found Swan's reaction "quite outrageous" and surprising, considering that earlier in the week, in response to Opposition critics, the minister expressed reluctance to interfere in the review board process.
Yaren said that Swan's action and comments Thursday also seem to signal a change in government philosophy.
"His predecessor, David Chomiak, was really quite a champion for the mentally ill and also as justice minister. So there seems to be a turnabout in the whole philosophy of the government that's being espoused," he said.
In an e-mail through an intermediary Friday, Swan reiterated his position that public safety must be the paramount concern.
"We respect the Criminal Code Review Board and the need to ensure the ability of those deemed not criminally responsible to recover and potentially begin a process of reintegration into society after an appropriate period of treatment," he said.
"However, it is our view that this order — taken a mere two years since this terrible crime was committed — is contrary to the interests of public safety and seriously undermines public confidence in the Canadian justice system."
Mental-health advocates have been critical of politicians of all political stripes, saying their reaction to the Li decision has been stigmatizing and hurtful to people with mental disorders and their families.
But Conservative Leader Hugh McFadyen said Friday it is important not to lose sight of what happened in this case — "that Tim McLean died at the hands of Vince Li in the most horrible way imaginable."
"This happened less than two years ago and today decisions need to be made that take into account the need to balance public safety and compassion for somebody with a mental illness," McFadyen said. "We believe that in the circumstances of this case that public safety should come first."


I completely agree with the psychiatrists. This is "political pandering." The province has no right to overrule what is stated in the Criminal Code and to overrule a decision made by a review board and doctors who are knowledgeable and educated in the issues of mental illness and public safety. They should be trusted in their decisions. Denying Li this basic human right of sunshine and fresh air, is inhumane and completely unacceptable. It would be beneficial and help facilitate his rehabilitation and treatment. Confinement can lead to further mental health issues such as depression and can worsen one`s mental condition. Li is a victim of his mental disorder. He was not mentally present during the crime. His actions were completely out of his control, not conscious and involuntary. They were unintentional. The only thing you can blame is schizophrenia. You cannot blame Li, the human being. The mentally ill need to be treated with respect and dignity and in a humane manner. Li is a completely different person mentally now, than he was two years ago. He is taking medications and is attending programming and treatment and is much less of a danger to the public. Allowing Li to have supervised walks, would not have posed a risk to anybody. This is a basic right, which he should have always been receiving. Nothing can go wrong -- he would be supervised by two armed guards and it would be short periods outside. The government is acting on the misinformed and ignorant public opinion who are seeking revenge, instead of looking at the risks and the facts.

The majority of the public is ignorant and uneducated about mental illness. There is a widespread and general lack of knowledge. We need to trust the experts involved to help Li in his treatment to the point where he no longer poses a threat to public safety. By denying Li the right to go outside, is taking our mental health system back to the dark ages! We should not be imprisoning, deporting or executing the mentally ill, like some of the public advocate for. This is unduly harsh and barbaric! We live in civilized society and revenge against the mentally ill, no matter what act they committed, should have no place in such societies. Legally, Mr.Li is not a criminal. Therefore, he should not be treated worse than a prisoner. The public is non compassionate, narrow minded and lacks understanding about mental illnesses. 

“Li apologized, asking police to kill him – evidence that he knew what he had done and that he knew it was wrong”
Well Duh! Someone with mental illness usually does know that what they are experiencing is not normal. Especially when they experience psychotic episodes.
That statement to me shows how much pain Li was in. The struggle he had being fighting. A fight he has had to fight alone, because of the stigma of mental illness.
For people suffering with this it’s like being in a 3-D movie for days or weeks on end. The problem is they can’t get up and leave the theatre.
Cognitive therapy is the preferred method, in my opinion. Once those avenues are exhausted, then medication may be the final option. If that is the case, a support network needs to be available for that individual to ensure that the medication continues.

We understand that the majority of comments are from your everyday working stiffs with limited understanding of deeper issues like this one.

Most can't get past their own emotions regarding a psychotic episode involving brutal murder and cannibalism. The reaction is mostly fear, bolstered by anger and a sense of helplessness.

Being able to separate emotion from thoughts and choice requires an awareness that you just aren't going to see represented here, on a web-based, anonymous comment section.

The truth is, this man poses little or no threat (on medication) while walking outside for 15 minutes twice a day. There's even less of a threat while accompanied by armed guard.

Andrew Swan continues to show his inexperience, and was prematurely appointed to the Attorney General position. He will continue to show his shortcomings in that position as time goes on.

All in all, an embarrassing situation that fans the flames of fear and confusion in the community. Hence the revealing comments here, ...but still, remarkably predictable.

"Everyone who sympathizes with this piece of crap beware the next murder will be someone you love, and you'll see how it feels to see people siding with a murderer."

Or, you or someone you love may develop a psychosis and commit murder and you'll see how it feels to see people calling you or your loved one a monster or an animal and screaming for the death penalty. Don't think it can happen? Think again. 

No comments:

Post a Comment